[Visalia, CA] Saturday 9/11 TAP Potluck and Video

9/11 Truth Action Project

Monday, October 22, 2018 7:43 pm

https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/612-the-truth-about-the-28-pages-and-it-s-enduring-cover-up

The Truth About the 28 Pages and It's Enduring Cover-Up

The lead sponsors of the legislation to uncover the 28 pages of the Congressional report on the attacks of 9-11 were Representative Walter Jones and Senator Rand Paul…

Comments

Tom Fontaine Sunday, October 21, 2018 12:53 pm

Some info on my home page about 60 posts of researched 911 info if you all like This one is from Oct 12, 2018 https://www.facebook.com/thomas.w.fontaine/posts/10216977008559373

Jose Ignacio Alvarez Monday, October 22, 2018 7:43 pm

28 pages is another ploy to divert attention away from Israel, and focus on the House of Saud.

9/11 Truth Action Project

Monday, October 22, 2018 11:54 am

https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/613-boston-9-11-truth-celebrates-independence-day

Boston 9/11 Truth Celebrates

911tap.org

On July 4, 2016, members of Boston 9/11 Truth celebrated their independence from the fraudulent official narrative of what happened on September 11, 2001…

9/11 Truth Action Project

Sunday, October 21, 2018 10:03 pm

9/11 TRUTH ENDS THE WARS 9/11 TAP Endorses The 2018 Women's March on the Pentagon: "Our demands are simple: The complete end to the wars abroad" https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/763-9-11-tap-endorses-the-2018-women-s-march-on-the-pentagon

9/11 TAP Endorses The 2018 Women's March on the Pentagon

911tap.org

Women's March on the Pentagon: The complete end to the wars abroad; closure of foreign bases; dramatically slash the Pentagon budget to fund healthy social programs here at home: the only good empire is a gone empire.

Comments

Dominic Jermano Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:17 am

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/trump-fleeces-kim-woo-choong-murders-korean-president-dominic-jermano-1d/

9/11 Truth Action Project Sunday, October 21, 2018 10:02 pm

Connecticut Supports the Women's March on the Pentagon. Our Support Rally in West Hartford, CT

9/11 Truth Action Project Sunday, October 21, 2018 10:03 pm

Connecticut Supports the Women's March on the Pentagon. Our Support Rally in West Hartford, CT

9/11 Truth Action Project

Thursday, October 18, 2018 12:01 pm

https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/611-six-panels-on-the-deep-state-at-2016-left-forum-conference-in-new-york-city

Six Panels on the Deep State at 2016 Left Forum Conference in New York City

911tap.org

On May 21-22, 2016, six panels on Deep State topics were presented at the annual Left Forum in New York City…

Comments

Todd Allan Thursday, October 18, 2018 12:01 pm

We cannot change this evil world with "rage". What we need is caring and compassion. Love is the Revolution.

9/11 Truth Action Project

Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:45 am

https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/472-installation-of-a-9-11-memorial-in-melbourne-fl

Installation of a 9/11 Memorial in Melbourne FL

911tap.org

One of the most recent 9/11 memorials to receive a piece of steel from the World Trade Center was Honor America Inc’s Liberty Bell Memorial Museum in Melbourne, FL. The steel piece is an I-beam...

9/11 Truth Action Project

Monday, October 15, 2018 7:31 pm

https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/470-observed-deceleration-of-ua-175-during-the-impact-at-the-south-tower

Observed Deceleration of UA 175

911tap.org

The fact that some people insist that no airplane impacted WTC 1 and WTC 2 is very distracting. Here the physics shows that impact actually occurred...

Comments

Ray Kraaijenhagen Sunday, September 30, 2018 12:46 pm

Not only an airplane impacted.

Cheri Jacobs Aspenleiter Sunday, September 30, 2018 4:27 pm

You have it wrong. It is commonly agreed that no COMMERCIAL jet hit the Towers not that a weaponized drone did not. Please do not confuse the facts.

George Firis Sunday, September 30, 2018 5:00 pm

note the buldge on the lower right of the jet

Mark Volgyesi Monday, October 01, 2018 3:00 am

I think the no plane theory is debunked. The planes that did impact the buildings must have been modified to attain speeds and manuverability witnessed in the videos as well as being able to penetrate into a steel and concrete building without crumpling on the outside of it. Aluminum is a soft metal in comparison.

Chris Cerullo Monday, October 01, 2018 10:01 pm

They used a Wing-Tip Missile, painted as a Jet-Liner, than used a extremely strong "Holograph" blended within its surroundings....That 's how they achieved their Scheme, the Controlled Demolition took care of the rest of the destruction.....Any other Questions....?

Brian Murphy Monday, October 15, 2018 3:16 pm

I don't think it is known what hit the WTC. There are a lot of conflicting data points on this. It is unfortunate that some folks at 911 TAP feel the need to indicate some level of confidence about what hit the WTC. Although the analysis in this article is useful, it does not lay anything to rest, because it does not explain all the available evidence, physical and otherwise, on the issue. In fact, just limiting the analysis to the cited evidence, it also fails to consider the range of phenomena that could explain the minor deceleration of the observed object, or movement of the buildings. And, dare I say, I don't think it accurately and fully addresses the Newtonian physics involved. I am deeply skeptical that the aluminum wings of a Boeing 767 are going to penetrate what is essentially a wall of high grade steel columns. I think deep skepticism is also called for when the observed deceleration of the plane in this analysis is considered in light of the amount of flooring material and inner core the fuselage would encounter in its path. We don't know, so let's not pretend to know.

Brian Murphy Monday, October 15, 2018 6:59 pm

I just read the Salter analysis. I believe it is flawed, and offer this for the consideration of whoever posted this article to 911 TAP. Salter performed an analysis of the velocity of the plane, stated in terms of pixels per frame. He shows a number of jolts in the observed speed. First, the nose hits, then the engines, then the wings. He shows a jolt and a deceleration at each impact. This is not correct. The plane is ploughing through building material. Let’s say there is a plane and it makes it into the building. The plane encounters the outer façade, the floor slabs, decking, trusses, the inner core, the building material on the other side of the inner core as it ploughs through the building. From the moment of impact through to a velocity of zero, there is an unbroken period of deceleration. The plane must decelerate continuously because more plane material is coming into contact with building material, the surface area of the zone of exchange of forces is increasing as the plane enters, from 0% interaction just before nose strikes, to 100% immersion when the tail disappears. The constant rate of speed between jolts shown by Salter cannot possibly be correct when you think about it in this way.

Brian Murphy Monday, October 15, 2018 7:31 pm

OK. One last thought on the Salter, and I’m done. Note the final period of deceleration, after frame 12, from 503 pixels per frame to zero. If an impact is required for a deceleration, what causes the plane to lose 80% of its velocity after all impacts have occurred? Why wouldn’t the plane just continue through the outer wall, with a minor deceleration from that impact, under Salter’s reasoning? Does it make any sense that the full length of the plane would show little deceleration jolts as its entire length went in, through the entirety of the inner core, only to decelerate from 80% of its pre-entry velocity to 0 in the few remaining feet between total entry and impact with the outer wall on the other side of the core? I don’t think this makes any sense at all, if you think about it. This analysis implies that we should have seen a significant ejection of plane debris, at hundreds of miles per hour, out the other side of the tower. But, that didn’t happen. At best, this is inconclusive. I certainly don’t think this analysis proves that whatever hit the South tower corresponds with the object that appears to the naked eye in the footage, laying to rest the possibility that something other than a Boeing airplane hit WTC South. To my mind, all sorts of alternatives remain.

9/11 Truth Action Project

Monday, October 15, 2018 7:03 am

If you want to take a stand for 9/11 Truth and do something so simple yet make a big impact, join the worldwide grassroots awareness banner campaign "I Am The Face of Truth" where a banner profile picture is made for you to use anywhere you use your avatar on social media, or put your image on a mouse pad or coffee cup - anywhere! Show your stance without saying a word and market 9/11 Truth 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/405-i-am-the-face-of-truth

“I Am the Face of Truth”

911tap.org

The 'I Am the Face of Truth' movement is a credible, worldwide movement for 9/11 truth that is igniting the torch of awareness of what really happened on September 11, 2001…

Comments

Hassan Ibrahim Monday, October 15, 2018 7:03 am

Is truth.movement.

9/11 Truth Action Project

Sunday, October 14, 2018 2:00 pm

Censored: Presentation on Ethics in Engineering https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/434-censored-presentation-on-ethics-in-engineering

Censored: Presentation on Ethics in Engineering

911tap.org

How the 43rd SEFI conference censored a paper that was a case study focused on the failures of the peer review process…

Comments

Richard McManus Sunday, October 14, 2018 12:53 am

Here is another very good video by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth that every Democratic Party candidate and public official should watch. https://www.ae911truth.org/continuing-ed/ae911-aag-l#p1 National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) spent $20 million, but they did not investigate why after the top 20 floors or the top 30 floors of the Twin Towers started to fall down, why the lower floor gave way vs. stopping these floors from falling to the ground. BECAUSE these two sections of 20 and 30 floor sections, they were made up a much lighter steel beams and columns. A light object CAN NOT COMPLETELY crush a heavier object. These top 20 and 30 floor sections should have stopped falling down. National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) spent $20 million, but they did not investigate why this happened. In this video is one of the best explanations of the seismic data recorded 20 miles away from the Twin Towers. We now can say that there were likely explosions prior to the airplanes impacting the Twin Towers and also explosions prior to the collapse of both towers. Witness statements from 503 FDNY first responders and of these, 118 observed flashes of light and sounds of explosions. Witnesses reported they felt the ground shake moments before the beginning of the collapse. One witness stated he/she saw flashes of light inside the building somewhere between the floors 10 thru 15 before the state of the tower collapsed. There are another 156 witnesses from people in New York City who say they saw the same things. It took a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit to force the New York City's fire Commissioner to make public this hard evidence. In August 2006 the Court order these statements made public. And none of this was in the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) report. An engineer determined from analysis of the steel wreckage from ground zero that the fires within the WTC buildings only was heated to 500 degree F. Yet NIST’s said the steel was heated to 1,800 degrees F. This was determined by analysis of the paint applied to the steel beams to prevent rusting. Two papers were writing by engineers explaining this, but the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has refused to publish these scientific papers the challenge the fraudulent papers written by Zdenek Bazant that supports NIST. An ethics complaint has been filed to the Board of the ASCE. At ground zero after the Twin Towers collapsed, there was a pile of twisted steel some 3 to 4 stories tall. But what happened to the 90,000 tons of concrete which made up the some 110 floors, each with four to eight inches of concrete in corrugated steel pans. There should have been in the wreckage large pieces of this concrete floors and not dust two to three inches thick on the streets of New York City or blow out to the ocean. And the was some 10,000 steel file cabinets in the Twin Towers offices, but only one was found in the wreckage. 700 bone fragments were found on a building several blocks away from North Tower, and each one was only a centimeter long. One person’s body was turned into 200 pieces of flesh or bone. Pieces of some 1,000 bodies were never found. Three engineers at first stated they thought explosions caused the collapse, but later they change their stories to agreeing with the official BS that fire alone was the cause. NIST lied by adding 5,000 pounds of weight to their computer model trying to account for their theory about the outer box columns being buckle/break due only to heat causing the trusses to sag. What really happened that caused this was the 47 center core columns started falling first. No steel high rise building collapsed due to fire and after the collapse molten steel was found in the wreckage. In 2004 a 56 story building burnt for 17 hours for 26 floors and it did not collapse. In 1991 a 38 story building burnt for 18 hours for 8 floors and it did not collapse. National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) spent $20 million, but they did not investigate why the Twin Towers fell down but never happened to these steel buildings.

Brian Murphy Sunday, October 14, 2018 12:32 pm

This is great. I think this is a very fruitful area to continue to pursue. I just can't imagine that the engineering community is going to be able to accept these ethical issues and mockery of professional standards for too long. They must cave in at some point to avoid total loss of credibility.

Brian Murphy Sunday, October 14, 2018 2:00 pm

I think it would be a good tactic to ask SEFI and any other ethics body to put down in writing in a formal document with signatures the specific bases for the censorship. I think this would raise the legal and ethical stakes for whoever is sanctioning the censorship

9/11 Truth Action Project

Sunday, October 14, 2018 1:15 pm

Installation of a 9/11 Memorial in Melbourne, FL https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/472-installation-of-a-9-11-memorial-in-melbourne-fl

Installation of a 9/11 Memorial in Melbourne FL

911tap.org

One of the most recent 9/11 memorials to receive a piece of steel from the World Trade Center was Honor America Inc’s Liberty Bell Memorial Museum in Melbourne, FL. The steel piece is an I-beam...

Comments

Chris Cerullo Thursday, October 11, 2018 10:56 pm

It should have been Evidence, for a crime scene, during 9/11, oh that's right, the "NWO" rushed to get rid the Steel & send it to China.....Except this piece......!

Dave Adam Sunday, October 14, 2018 1:15 pm

I don't understand 9/11 lies

9/11 Truth Action Project

Tuesday, October 09, 2018 11:00 am

Victoria Alexander - Locus Amoenus - Could her book be a breakthrough for the 9/11 Truth Movement as the world wrestles with the ghosts of our past? https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/467-locus-amoenus-a-new-novel

Locus Amoenus, a New Novel

911tap.org

The new novel by Victoria N. Alexander, Locus Amoenus, weaves an important modern-day tale following the outline of the tragedy, Hamlet...

9/11 Truth Action Project

Monday, October 08, 2018 12:25 am

Once we know the truth, the lies no longer have power over us. Media War Toolkit - The Seven Deadliest Weapons Against Establishment Propaganda https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/683-media-war-toolkit-the-seven-deadliest-weapons-against-establishment-propaganda

Media War Toolkit — The Seven Deadliest Weapons Against Establishment Propaganda

911tap.org

The corporatist oligarchs who have shored up power in America, rule not by punishing and executing dissidents, but by creating the illusion of freedom while keeping its subjects enslaved…

Comments

Todd Allan Sunday, October 07, 2018 12:39 pm

Another key fact about Syria is that their leader, Bashar al-Assad, was educated in England and was a doctor specializing in ophthalmology. When his younger brother and heir apparent died suddenly, his father Hafez al-Assad called him home, and he had no desire to return to Syria. MI6 BEGGED him to return and lead his nation. The British crown feared destabilization in the region from a succession struggle without Bashar. Hardly the cloth from which tyrants are cut.

Don Alexander Monday, October 08, 2018 12:25 am

Great article; many good points and suggestions. I wasn't surprised to find it was written by Johnstone. She's doing great things for human freedom. (Now if the humans will just start listening...)

9/11 Truth Action Project

Friday, October 05, 2018 10:32 pm

JUSTICE . . . there seems to be a theme here! 9/11 Victim Geoff Campbell and the Legal Quest for Justice https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/471-9-11-victim-geoff-campbell-and-the-legal-quest-for-justice

9/11 Victim Geoff Campbell and the Legal Quest for Justice

911tap.org

UK citizen Matt Campbell, who lost his brother Geoff in WTC 1 on 9/11, has been on a quest to find justice for his brother's murder...

Comments

Dominic Jermano Friday, October 05, 2018 7:35 am

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/trump-fleeces-kim-woo-choong-murders-korean-president-dominic-jermano-1d/?published=t

Brian Murphy Friday, October 05, 2018 3:02 pm

I think the 1,000 + vaporized people, no remains, and the people for whom more than 100 separate pieces have been recovered, including tiny shards of bone, are a potent part of the story. I don't think we should pussyfoot around with this evidence. Rather than sheepishly saying, "how could gravity do this?" we should call a spade a spade and say these people were blown to bits and vaporized. Because that is what the hard physical evidence shows, and there is no reasonable basis for doubt about it.

Wenceslao Gonzalez Friday, October 05, 2018 7:45 pm

And Dick Cheney, Donald Runsfield, Larry Silverstein, Bush, and all the others are free and on the loose.

John Hughes Friday, October 05, 2018 10:30 pm

John Hughes Friday, October 05, 2018 10:32 pm

9/11 Truth Action Project

Thursday, October 04, 2018 5:57 am

New.... https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-resolution/610📁

S.Res.610 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): A resolution urging the release of information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks upon the United States.

congress.gov

Summary of S.Res.610 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): A resolution urging the release of information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks upon the United States.

9/11 Truth Action Project

Wednesday, October 03, 2018 8:27 pm

https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/686-countering-the-false-narrative-of-9-11-in-greenfield-ma

Countering the False Narrative of 9/11 in Greenfield, MA

911tap.org

An article published by the Greenfield Recorder recounts the origins of a local community event which imprints a false narrative into people who were too young to experience the events of 9/11 at any level…

Comments

Richard McManus Wednesday, October 03, 2018 8:25 pm

Tell me how the terrorist knew that all the war games would be on-going prior to and during 9/11? The four Air Force exercises wherein false radar blips were inserted onto FAA and NORAD radar scopes? How did the terrorists know the best places was in the USA to turn off the transponders so radars could not see them and/or have a great deal of difficulty seeing them on radar scopes without transponders sending signals? How did the alleged terrorist know that other commercial airplanes would be in areas (and/or crossing paths with the jet they were hijacking) such that turning off the transponders prior to crossing, air traffic controllers could get confused. For example, UA 175 turned off its transponder just prior to crossing flight paths with UA93 (with its transponder on) and heading east like UA 175 should have been doing but started to turn around and head to New York City after these airplanes crossing paths. UA 175 was the jet that crashed into the south Twin Tower. How did AA11 know to turn off its transponder after being order by air traffic controllers to turn right 20 degrees so it would not come too close to MD80 How did the alleged terrorist know that MD80 on a flight to LA would confuse the air traffic controller into thinking AA11 did not turn off its transponder. How did UA93 know to make a U-turn and head back east, just after coming close to Delta Flight 1989,( another flight headed to LA) To see this link of a video of what I tried to describe above and to me does not equal it was just due to chance. Especially when we ask the question of how did the alleged terrorist know war games would fog up the air traffic controllers and NORAD radars with a bunch of what they call likely radar blip NOISE or NOT REAL BLIPS due to real airplanes. http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=3907 How did they know that there were only a few US Air Force fighter jets ready to intercept a hijacked airplane in the northeast US States US? Why were the war game, radar blips still being injected onto FAA and NORAD radar screens until at least 0930 and 1012 hours yet the second airplane crashed into the Twin Tower at 0903 hours. These US Air Force war games made it appear there were 22 hijackings on-going? Tell my why the NORAD or FAA was tacking American Airlines 11 they believed was still in the air and an in-progress of hijacking, yet it had already crashed into the Twin Tower 08:46 AM. Why did the US Air Force Generals did not tell the 9/11 Commission about all this? Geophysicist André Rousseau’s, PhD analysis of the seismic signals (waves) reveal explosives were used on 9/11 At the moment of the Twin Towers and WTC7 collapsed seismic waves were generated. The degree that low frequencies are associated with an energy (magnitude) that is comparable to a seismic event, these waves undeniably have an explosive origin. The impacts of the airplanes into the Twin Towers would not have generated large enough seismic waves to be recorded 34 km away. Debris that fell onto the ground from the Twin Towers would not have generated large enough seismic waves to be recorded 34 km away. The low frequencies could not have been provoked other than by explosions. An explosion at the base of WTC1 (the north Tower and the first one hit by an airplane) was heard and felt by witness William Rodriquez and he said some seconds later he heard the airplane crash that occurred many stories in the Tower. Rodriquez and several other co-workers were in a basement level of the North Tower and below them in a lower basement level, a massive explosion happened pushing the floor they were standing on upward. Some co-workers working in lower basement levels were injured and/or badly burned as a result. “And there was a huge explosion at the top of the building. You could hear the difference from the bottom and all the way to the top. The one from the top, which was actually seconds after, was very far away. The one in the basement was pretty loud and you felt your actual feet moving with the floor. There was a tremor through the walls, that the walls cracked and the false ceiling totally collapsed.” https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/explosions-before-plane-impact-the-911-account-of-william-rodriguez/ If we consider the time of the impact of the plane into the north Tower furnished by the NTSB was 8.46 AM and 40 seconds the only reliable data. There was a hiatus of 15 seconds between this plausible time of the airplane impact and time a seismic wave (a Rayleigh wave) started. What else but an explosion could be the origin for this seismic wave in the absence of an earthquake? The time this wave started was recorded and determined by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO) 34 km from New York City. Rousseau’s analysis corroborate William Rodriquez witness statement. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_160.htm The best engineering explanation/proof that NIST lied https://www.ae911truth.org/project-due-diligence Part 1: World Trade Center Building 7 Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat https://www.ae911truth.org/continuing-ed/ae911-aag-l#p3 In progress... a federal special grand jury investigating 9/11 The sum total of this evidence proves that explosives and/or incendiaries were used to do a controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center buildings. To save your time, start reading at page 15 to see the listed evidence presented in the petition. https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/lc-doj-grand-jury-petition/ Here is a good video regarding a federal special grand jury set in motion by the group Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. It explains why the US Attorney is required to present evidence submitted as attachments (exhibits) regarding alleged federal crimes that occurred on 9/11. go to this URL and hear and learn the details. https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1383-lawyers-petition-for-9-11-grand-jury/ for more see: Irrefutable Evidence - The 9/11 Official Story is Total BS fourth edition send me an email at dick.mcmanus@yahoo.com and I will reply with it attach for free. or For sale at Amazon Kindle books https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=Some%20Unpopular%20History%20of%20the%20United%20States%20

Richard McManus Wednesday, October 03, 2018 8:26 pm

“The 9/11 attack was planned and direct in Afghanistan.” But how did NATO become involved in this war? NATO went to war with the US based on US classified information. But WHO ordered the 9/11 attacks? US Ambassador Frank Taylor the US’s Ambassador for Counter Terrorism briefed NATO country’s representative (Council) on Oct. 2, 2001 ALLEGING CONLUSIVELY the role of Al Qaeda’s and the TALEBAN regime rule in the 9/11 attack and the crash of UA flight 93 NATO Council members as a resulted voted to invoke Article 5 of the NATO/US treaty. Therein declaring WAR on Afghanistan. The Amb. Taylor briefing remained classified for nearly ten years allegedly proving Al Qaeda had directed the 9/11 attacks until April 5, 2009. Learn more here; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_LVbu7HCa0 more details here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Moz8hs2lJik Who was Amb. Francis X. "Frank" Taylor From July 1996 through July 1998 as commander of the Headquarters of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations at Bolling Air Force Base (and later at Andrews Air Force Base) where he was responsible for the US Air Force’s investigations of fraud, counterintelligence, and major criminal matters. Brigadier General Taylor (USAF) retired from active duty on July 1, 2001. Taylor subsequently held this office from July 13, 2001 until November 15, 2002. In this role, he was responsible for implementing U.S. counterterrorism policy overseas and coordinating the U.S. government response to international terrorist activities. In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, he was a key advisor in assisting the President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell in forming the international coalition against terrorism and developing aggressive international policy implementation to defeat terrorism. Was he the African American fast tracked in the USAF Bush’s token Black man? ( anything is possible when looking into the 9/11 mystery) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_X._Taylor The Authorization for Use of Military Force AUMF has also been cited by a wide variety of US officials as justification for continuing US military actions all over the world. Often the phrases "Al-Qaeda and associated forces" or "affiliated forces" have been used by these officials. However, that phrase does not appear in the AUMF. the AUMF has been used to allow military action in Afghanistan, the Philippines, Georgia, Yemen, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Iraq, and Somalia. IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons. How did Bush determine Al Qaeda and the TALIBAN regime did 9/11?

Richard McManus Wednesday, October 03, 2018 8:27 pm

Why did the State Department make note of some classified information regarding United Airlines flight 93 in the above posted comment? Did someone want to make sure the voice with an Arab accent was heard? One thing that really hit me as suspicious was the radio conversation between the air traffic controller and the alleged hijacker who voice had an Arab sounding accent. The radio conversation was tape record by the FAA. As I have worked using a radio, I know someone can jam a radio transmission if he/she is closer to the air traffic controller's location. Now why is this important? Because the alleged hijacker has been reported to have mistakenly turned on flight 93's (which crashed in Pennsylvania) intercom and told the passenger that he had a bomb and for everyone to remain seated (or something to that affect/effect.) After this radio message was heard by the air traffic controller, he has a conversation with other airline pilots in the general area and from their conversation, it was very likely the hijackers message was not recorded by the FAA audio tape recorder. Because the alleged hijacker needed to make damn sure the world heard his faked mistake in the intercom, he again transmits his fake conversation about a bomb, etc. 9:28 United 93 acknowledged a transmission from an FAA center controller. This was the last normal radio communication the air traffic controllers had with United 93. The second jet hit the Twin Towers at 0903 AM. 9:29 A Cleveland Center controller and pilots of aircraft in the vicinity heard "a radio transmission of unintelligible sounds of possible screaming or a struggle from an unknown origin…" The controller responded, seconds later: "Somebody call Cleveland?" This was followed by a second radio transmission, with sounds of screaming and someone yelling "Get out of here, get out of here," again from an unknown source. The Cleveland Center air traffic controller began to try to identify the possible source of the transmissions, and noticed that United 93 had descended some 700 feet. The controller attempted to raise United 93 several times, with no response. 9:30 The controller began to poll the other flights on his frequency to determine if they heard the screaming; several said they had. 9:32 A third radio transmission came over the frequency: "Keep remaining sitting. We have a bomb on board." The controller understood, but chose to respond: "Calling Cleveland center, you're unreadable. Say again, slowly." At this point, IN MY OPINION, the fakers of this radio transmission were not sure their message about screaming and a bomb was heard and its was extremely important to the whole 9/11 story to have audio evidence on tape at the FAA. He notified his supervisor, who passed the notice up the chain of command. 9:39 A forth radio transmission came over the radio frequency from United 93: THE ALLEGED HIJACKER: Uh, is the captain. Would like you all to remain seated. There is a bomb on board and are going back to the airport, and to have our demands [unintelligible]. Please remain quiet. The controller responded: "United 93, understand you have a bomb on board. Go ahead." The flight did not respond. You can listen to exact radio transmissions on this U-tube. So we are lead to believe the alleged hijacker did not realize he had not made a mistake in using the radio vs. the intercom. http://qandahar.tv/videos-september-pentagon-truth--%5Bae63iivRHt8%5D.cfm

9/11 Truth Action Project

Tuesday, October 02, 2018 1:34 am

From 9/11 to the Permanent Surveillance State

911tap.org

By December 15th Congress will decide whether to make warrant-less surveillance permanent – or allow the provision within the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Section 702, to expire as scheduled on Dec. 31

Comments

Chris Cerullo Monday, October 01, 2018 10:03 pm

Why are we beating this into ground, after 17 Years of getting, know where; with it...Enough is Enough.......!

Richard McManus Tuesday, October 02, 2018 1:33 am

Tell me how the terrorist knew that all the war games would be on-going prior to and during 9/11? The four Air Force exercises wherein false radar blips were inserted onto FAA and NORAD radar scopes? How did the terrorists know the best places was in the USA to turn off the transponders so radars could not see them and/or have a great deal of difficulty seeing them on radar scopes without transponders sending signals? How did the alleged terrorist know that other commercial airplanes would be in areas (and/or crossing paths with the jet they were hijacking) such that turning off the transponders prior to crossing, air traffic controllers could get confused. For example, UA 175 turned off its transponder just prior to crossing flight paths with UA93 (with its transponder on) and heading east like UA 175 should have been doing but started to turn around and head to New York City after these airplanes crossing paths. UA 175 was the jet that crashed into the south Twin Tower. How did AA11 know to turn off its transponder after being order by air traffic controllers to turn right 20 degrees so it would not come too close to MD80 How did the alleged terrorist know that MD80 on a flight to LA would confuse the air traffic controller into thinking AA11 did not turn off its transponder. How did UA93 know to make a U-turn and head back east, just after coming close to Delta Flight 1989,( another flight headed to LA) To see this link of a video of what I tried to describe above and to me does not equal it was just due to chance. Especially when we ask the question of how did the alleged terrorist know war games would fog up the air traffic controllers and NORAD radars with a bunch of what they call likely radar blip NOISE or NOT REAL BLIPS due to real airplanes. http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=3907 How did they know that there were only a few US Air Force fighter jets ready to intercept a hijacked airplane in the northeast US States US? Why were the war game, radar blips still being injected onto FAA and NORAD radar screens until at least 0930 and 1012 hours yet the second airplane crashed into the Twin Tower at 0903 hours. These US Air Force war games made it appear there were 22 hijackings on-going? Tell my why the NORAD or FAA was tacking American Airlines 11 they believed was still in the air and an in-progress of hijacking, yet it had already crashed into the Twin Tower 08:46 AM. Why did the US Air Force Generals did not tell the 9/11 Commission about all this? Geophysicist André Rousseau’s, PhD analysis of the seismic signals (waves) reveal explosives were used on 9/11 At the moment of the Twin Towers and WTC7 collapsed seismic waves were generated. The degree that low frequencies are associated with an energy (magnitude) that is comparable to a seismic event, these waves undeniably have an explosive origin. The impacts of the airplanes into the Twin Towers would not have generated large enough seismic waves to be recorded 34 km away. Debris that fell onto the ground from the Twin Towers would not have generated large enough seismic waves to be recorded 34 km away. The low frequencies could not have been provoked other than by explosions. An explosion at the base of WTC1 (the north Tower and the first one hit by an airplane) was heard and felt by witness William Rodriquez and he said some seconds later he heard the airplane crash that occurred many stories in the Tower. Rodriquez and several other co-workers were in a basement level of the North Tower and below them in a lower basement level, a massive explosion happened pushing the floor they were standing on upward. Some co-workers working in lower basement levels were injured and/or badly burned as a result. “And there was a huge explosion at the top of the building. You could hear the difference from the bottom and all the way to the top. The one from the top, which was actually seconds after, was very far away. The one in the basement was pretty loud and you felt your actual feet moving with the floor. There was a tremor through the walls, that the walls cracked and the false ceiling totally collapsed.” https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/explosions-before-plane-impact-the-911-account-of-william-rodriguez/ If we consider the time of the impact of the plane into the north Tower furnished by the NTSB was 8.46 AM and 40 seconds the only reliable data. There was a hiatus of 15 seconds between this plausible time of the airplane impact and time a seismic wave (a Rayleigh wave) started. What else but an explosion could be the origin for this seismic wave in the absence of an earthquake? The time this wave started was recorded and determined by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO) 34 km from New York City. Rousseau’s analysis corroborate William Rodriquez witness statement. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_160.htm The best engineering explanation/proof that NIST lied https://www.ae911truth.org/project-due-diligence Part 1: World Trade Center Building 7 Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat https://www.ae911truth.org/continuing-ed/ae911-aag-l#p3 In progress... a federal special grand jury investigating 9/11 The sum total of this evidence proves that explosives and/or incendiaries were used to do a controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center buildings. To save your time, start reading at page 15 to see the listed evidence presented in the petition. https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/lc-doj-grand-jury-petition/ Here is a good video regarding a federal special grand jury set in motion by the group Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. It explains why the US Attorney is required to present evidence submitted as attachments (exhibits) regarding alleged federal crimes that occurred on 9/11. go to this URL and hear and learn the details. https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1383-lawyers-petition-for-9-11-grand-jury/ for more see: Irrefutable Evidence - The 9/11 Official Story is Total BS fourth edition send me an email at dick.mcmanus@yahoo.com and I will reply with it attach for free. or For sale at Amazon Kindle books https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=Some%20Unpopular%20History%20of%20the%20United%20States%20

Richard McManus Tuesday, October 02, 2018 1:33 am

“The 9/11 attack was planned and direct in Afghanistan.” But how did NATO become involved in this war? NATO went to war with the US based on US classified information. But WHO ordered the 9/11 attacks? US Ambassador Frank Taylor the US’s Ambassador for Counter Terrorism briefed NATO country’s representative (Council) on Oct. 2, 2001 ALLEGING CONLUSIVELY the role of Al Qaeda’s and the TALEBAN regime rule in the 9/11 attack and the crash of UA flight 93 NATO Council members as a resulted voted to invoke Article 5 of the NATO/US treaty. Therein declaring WAR on Afghanistan. The Amb. Taylor briefing remained classified for nearly ten years allegedly proving Al Qaeda had directed the 9/11 attacks until April 5, 2009. Learn more here; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_LVbu7HCa0 more details here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Moz8hs2lJik Who was Amb. Francis X. "Frank" Taylor From July 1996 through July 1998 as commander of the Headquarters of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations at Bolling Air Force Base (and later at Andrews Air Force Base) where he was responsible for the US Air Force’s investigations of fraud, counterintelligence, and major criminal matters. Brigadier General Taylor (USAF) retired from active duty on July 1, 2001. Taylor subsequently held this office from July 13, 2001 until November 15, 2002. In this role, he was responsible for implementing U.S. counterterrorism policy overseas and coordinating the U.S. government response to international terrorist activities. In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, he was a key advisor in assisting the President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell in forming the international coalition against terrorism and developing aggressive international policy implementation to defeat terrorism. Was he the African American fast tracked in the USAF Bush’s token Black man? ( anything is possible when looking into the 9/11 mystery) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_X._Taylor The Authorization for Use of Military Force AUMF has also been cited by a wide variety of US officials as justification for continuing US military actions all over the world. Often the phrases "Al-Qaeda and associated forces" or "affiliated forces" have been used by these officials. However, that phrase does not appear in the AUMF. the AUMF has been used to allow military action in Afghanistan, the Philippines, Georgia, Yemen, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Iraq, and Somalia. IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons. How did Bush determine Al Qaeda and the TALIBAN regime did 9/11?

Richard McManus Tuesday, October 02, 2018 1:34 am

Why did the State Department make note of some classified information regarding United Airlines flight 93 in the above posted comment? Did someone want to make sure the voice with an Arab accent was heard? One thing that really hit me as suspicious was the radio conversation between the air traffic controller and the alleged hijacker who voice had an Arab sounding accent. The radio conversation was tape record by the FAA. As I have worked using a radio, I know someone can jam a radio transmission if he/she is closer to the air traffic controller's location. Now why is this important? Because the alleged hijacker has been reported to have mistakenly turned on flight 93's (which crashed in Pennsylvania) intercom and told the passenger that he had a bomb and for everyone to remain seated (or something to that affect/effect.) After this radio message was heard by the air traffic controller, he has a conversation with other airline pilots in the general area and from their conversation, it was very likely the hijackers message was not recorded by the FAA audio tape recorder. Because the alleged hijacker needed to make damn sure the world heard his faked mistake in the intercom, he again transmits his fake conversation about a bomb, etc. 9:28 United 93 acknowledged a transmission from an FAA center controller. This was the last normal radio communication the air traffic controllers had with United 93. The second jet hit the Twin Towers at 0903 AM. 9:29 A Cleveland Center controller and pilots of aircraft in the vicinity heard "a radio transmission of unintelligible sounds of possible screaming or a struggle from an unknown origin…" The controller responded, seconds later: "Somebody call Cleveland?" This was followed by a second radio transmission, with sounds of screaming and someone yelling "Get out of here, get out of here," again from an unknown source. The Cleveland Center air traffic controller began to try to identify the possible source of the transmissions, and noticed that United 93 had descended some 700 feet. The controller attempted to raise United 93 several times, with no response. 9:30 The controller began to poll the other flights on his frequency to determine if they heard the screaming; several said they had. 9:32 A third radio transmission came over the frequency: "Keep remaining sitting. We have a bomb on board." The controller understood, but chose to respond: "Calling Cleveland center, you're unreadable. Say again, slowly." At this point, IN MY OPINION, the fakers of this radio transmission were not sure their message about screaming and a bomb was heard and its was extremely important to the whole 9/11 story to have audio evidence on tape at the FAA. He notified his supervisor, who passed the notice up the chain of command. 9:39 A forth radio transmission came over the radio frequency from United 93: THE ALLEGED HIJACKER: Uh, is the captain. Would like you all to remain seated. There is a bomb on board and are going back to the airport, and to have our demands [unintelligible]. Please remain quiet. The controller responded: "United 93, understand you have a bomb on board. Go ahead." The flight did not respond. You can listen to exact radio transmissions on this U-tube. So we are lead to believe the alleged hijacker did not realize he had not made a mistake in using the radio vs. the intercom. http://qandahar.tv/videos-september-pentagon-truth--%5Bae63iivRHt8%5D.cfm

9/11 Truth Action Project

Saturday, September 29, 2018 6:50 pm

Press Release - The 52-page petition, accompanied by 57 exhibits, presents evidence that explosives were used to destroy the three WTC buildings, including: Independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries in the form of thermite or thermate. Expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11prior to the airplane impacts on the WTC Towers, and prior to the building collapses. Technical analysis of video evidence of the WTC building collapses. Firefighter reports of explosions, and of seeing “molten iron like in a foundry”. The petition states that the presence of molten iron would require temperatures higher than jet fuel and building contents could create when burned, but consistent with use of the high tech explosive and incendiary thermite or thermate. The presence of previously molten iron microspheres, which have been established by electron microscope analysis of WTC dust samples, by both government and independent scientists, is another phenomenon that would be scientifically impossible based on the burning of jet fuel and office contents alone. Video and eyewitness testimony of the ejection during the collapse of WTC 1 and 2 of heavy steel elements laterally from the buildings which would not be possible from a gravity collapse. Scientific analysis, eyewitness testimony, and government reports confirming sulfidation and high temperature corrosion of the steel found in the rubble after the collapse of the WTC towers and WTC 7, a phenomenon not expected in a jet fuel fire and gravity collapse but consistent with the use of thermate."

Comments

Richard McManus Saturday, September 29, 2018 6:48 pm

Tell me how the terrorist knew that all the war games would be on-going prior to and during 9/11? The four Air Force exercises wherein false radar blips were inserted onto FAA and NORAD radar scopes? How did the terrorists know the best places was in the USA to turn off the transponders so radars could not see them and/or have a great deal of difficulty seeing them on radar scopes without transponders sending signals? How did the alleged terrorist know that other commercial airplanes would be in areas (and/or crossing paths with the jet they were hijacking) such that turning off the transponders prior to crossing, air traffic controllers could get confused. For example, UA 175 turned off its transponder just prior to crossing flight paths with UA93 (with its transponder on) and heading east like UA 175 should have been doing but started to turn around and head to New York City after these airplanes crossing paths. UA 175 was the jet that crashed into the south Twin Tower. How did AA11 know to turn off its transponder after being order by air traffic controllers to turn right 20 degrees so it would not come too close to MD80 How did the alleged terrorist know that MD80 on a flight to LA would confuse the air traffic controller into thinking AA11 did not turn off its transponder. How did UA93 know to make a U-turn and head back east, just after coming close to Delta Flight 1989,( another flight headed to LA) To see this link of a video of what I tried to describe above and to me does not equal it was just due to chance. Especially when we ask the question of how did the alleged terrorist know war games would fog up the air traffic controllers and NORAD radars with a bunch of what they call likely radar blip NOISE or NOT REAL BLIPS due to real airplanes. http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=3907 How did they know that there were only a few US Air Force fighter jets ready to intercept a hijacked airplane in the northeast US States US? Why were the war game, radar blips still being injected onto FAA and NORAD radar screens until at least 0930 and 1012 hours yet the second airplane crashed into the Twin Tower at 0903 hours. These US Air Force war games made it appear there were 22 hijackings on-going? Tell my why the NORAD or FAA was tacking American Airlines 11 they believed was still in the air and an in-progress of hijacking, yet it had already crashed into the Twin Tower 08:46 AM. Why did the US Air Force Generals did not tell the 9/11 Commission about all this?

Richard McManus Saturday, September 29, 2018 6:49 pm

“The 9/11 attack was planned and direct in Afghanistan.” But how did NATO become involved in this war? NATO went to war with the US based on US classified information. But WHO ordered the 9/11 attacks? US Ambassador Frank Taylor the US’s Ambassador for Counter Terrorism briefed NATO country’s representative (Council) on Oct. 2, 2001 ALLEGING CONLUSIVELY the role of Al Qaeda’s and the TALEBAN regime rule in the 9/11 attack and the crash of UA flight 93 NATO Council members as a resulted voted to invoke Article 5 of the NATO/US treaty. Therein declaring WAR on Afghanistan. The Amb. Taylor briefing remained classified for nearly ten years allegedly proving Al Qaeda had directed the 9/11 attacks until April 5, 2009. Learn more here; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_LVbu7HCa0 more details here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Moz8hs2lJik Who was Amb. Francis X. "Frank" Taylor From July 1996 through July 1998 as commander of the Headquarters of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations at Bolling Air Force Base (and later at Andrews Air Force Base) where he was responsible for the US Air Force’s investigations of fraud, counterintelligence, and major criminal matters. Brigadier General Taylor (USAF) retired from active duty on July 1, 2001. Taylor subsequently held this office from July 13, 2001 until November 15, 2002. In this role, he was responsible for implementing U.S. counterterrorism policy overseas and coordinating the U.S. government response to international terrorist activities. In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, he was a key advisor in assisting the President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell in forming the international coalition against terrorism and developing aggressive international policy implementation to defeat terrorism. Was he the African American fast tracked in the USAF Bush’s token Black man? ( anything is possible when looking into the 9/11 mystery) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_X._Taylor The Authorization for Use of Military Force AUMF has also been cited by a wide variety of US officials as justification for continuing US military actions all over the world. Often the phrases "Al-Qaeda and associated forces" or "affiliated forces" have been used by these officials. However, that phrase does not appear in the AUMF. the AUMF has been used to allow military action in Afghanistan, the Philippines, Georgia, Yemen, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Iraq, and Somalia. IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons. How did Bush determine Al Qaeda and the TALIBAN regime did 9/11?

Richard McManus Saturday, September 29, 2018 6:50 pm

Why did the State Department make note of some classified information regarding United Airlines flight 93 in the above posted comment? Did someone want to make sure the voice with an Arab accent was heard? One thing that really hit me as suspicious was the radio conversation between the air traffic controller and the alleged hijacker who voice had an Arab sounding accent. The radio conversation was tape record by the FAA. As I have worked using a radio, I know someone can jam a radio transmission if he/she is closer to the air traffic controller's location. Now why is this important? Because the alleged hijacker has been reported to have mistakenly turned on flight 93's (which crashed in Pennsylvania) intercom and told the passenger that he had a bomb and for everyone to remain seated (or something to that affect/effect.) After this radio message was heard by the air traffic controller, he has a conversation with other airline pilots in the general area and from their conversation, it was very likely the hijackers message was not recorded by the FAA audio tape recorder. Because the alleged hijacker needed to make damn sure the world heard his faked mistake in the intercom, he again transmits his fake conversation about a bomb, etc. 9:28 United 93 acknowledged a transmission from an FAA center controller. This was the last normal radio communication the air traffic controllers had with United 93. The second jet hit the Twin Towers at 0903 AM. 9:29 A Cleveland Center controller and pilots of aircraft in the vicinity heard "a radio transmission of unintelligible sounds of possible screaming or a struggle from an unknown origin…" The controller responded, seconds later: "Somebody call Cleveland?" This was followed by a second radio transmission, with sounds of screaming and someone yelling "Get out of here, get out of here," again from an unknown source. The Cleveland Center air traffic controller began to try to identify the possible source of the transmissions, and noticed that United 93 had descended some 700 feet. The controller attempted to raise United 93 several times, with no response. 9:30 The controller began to poll the other flights on his frequency to determine if they heard the screaming; several said they had. 9:32 A third radio transmission came over the frequency: "Keep remaining sitting. We have a bomb on board." The controller understood, but chose to respond: "Calling Cleveland center, you're unreadable. Say again, slowly." At this point, IN MY OPINION, the fakers of this radio transmission were not sure their message about screaming and a bomb was heard and its was extremely important to the whole 9/11 story to have audio evidence on tape at the FAA. He notified his supervisor, who passed the notice up the chain of command. 9:39 A forth radio transmission came over the radio frequency from United 93: THE ALLEGED HIJACKER: Uh, is the captain. Would like you all to remain seated. There is a bomb on board and are going back to the airport, and to have our demands [unintelligible]. Please remain quiet. The controller responded: "United 93, understand you have a bomb on board. Go ahead." The flight did not respond. You can listen to exact radio transmissions on this U-tube. So we are lead to believe the alleged hijacker did not realize he had not made a mistake in using the radio vs. the intercom. http://qandahar.tv/videos-september-pentagon-truth--%5Bae63iivRHt8%5D.cfm

9/11 Truth Action Project

Friday, September 28, 2018 4:08 pm

HELP SPREAD THE NEWS!!!

Federal Grand Jury Petition Filed for New 9/11 Investigation; Evidence Rules Out a Gravity-Only Collapse

911tap.org

Lawyers Committee petition to the Department of Justice brings forward into a court of law the cavalcade of credible evidence disproving the official story which blames fire alone for the collapse of the WTC buildings.

Comments

Richard McManus Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:21 am

Tell me how the terrorist knew that all the war games would be on-going prior to and during 9/11? The four Air Force exercises wherein false radar blips were inserted onto FAA and NORAD radar scopes? How did the terrorists know the best places was in the USA to turn off the transponders so radars could not see them and/or have a great deal of difficulty seeing them on radar scopes without transponders sending signals? How did they know that there were only a few US Air Force fighter jets ready to intercept a hijacked airplane in the northeast US States US? Why were the war game, radar blips still being injected onto FAA and NORAD radar screens until at least 0930 and 1012 hours yet the second airplane crashed into the Twin Tower at 0903 hours. These US Air Force war games made it appear there were 22 hijackings on-going? Tell my why the NORAD or FAA was tacking American Airlines 11 they believed was still in the air and an in-progress of hijacking, yet it had already crashed into the Twin Tower 08:46 AM. Why did the US Air Force Generals did not tell the 9/11 Commission about all this? Geophysicist André Rousseau’s, PhD analysis of the seismic signals (waves) reveal explosives were used on 9/11 At the moment of the Twin Towers and WTC7 collapsed seismic waves were generated. The degree that low frequencies are associated with an energy (magnitude) that is comparable to a seismic event, these waves undeniably have an explosive origin. The impacts of the airplanes into the Twin Towers would not have generated large enough seismic waves to be recorded 34 km away. Debris that fell onto the ground from the Twin Towers would not have generated large enough seismic waves to be recorded 34 km away. The low frequencies could not have been provoked other than by explosions. An explosion at the base of WTC1 (the north Tower and the first one hit by an airplane) was heard and felt by witness William Rodriquez and he said some seconds later he heard the airplane crash that occurred many stories in the Tower. Rodriquez and several other co-workers were in a basement level of the North Tower and below them in a lower basement level, a massive explosion happened pushing the floor they were standing on upward. Some co-workers working in lower basement levels were injured and/or badly burned as a result. “And there was a huge explosion at the top of the building. You could hear the difference from the bottom and all the way to the top. The one from the top, which was actually seconds after, was very far away. The one in the basement was pretty loud and you felt your actual feet moving with the floor. There was a tremor through the walls, that the walls cracked and the false ceiling totally collapsed.” https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/explosions-before-plane-impact-the-911-account-of-william-rodriguez/ If we consider the time of the impact of the plane into the north Tower furnished by the NTSB was 8.46 AM and 40 seconds the only reliable data. There was a hiatus of 15 seconds between this plausible time of the airplane impact and time a seismic wave (a Rayleigh wave) started. What else but an explosion could be the origin for this seismic wave in the absence of an earthquake? The time this wave started was recorded and determined by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO) 34 km from New York City. Rousseau’s analysis corroborate William Rodriquez witness statement. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_160.htm The best engineering explanation/proof that NIST lied https://www.ae911truth.org/project-due-diligence Part 1: World Trade Center Building 7 Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat https://www.ae911truth.org/continuing-ed/ae911-aag-l#p3 In progress... a federal special grand jury investigating 9/11 The sum total of this evidence proves that explosives and/or incendiaries were used to do a controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center buildings. To save your time, start reading at page 15 to see the listed evidence presented in the petition. https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/lc-doj-grand-jury-petition/ Here is a good video regarding a federal special grand jury set in motion by the group Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. It explains why the US Attorney is required to present evidence submitted as attachments (exhibits) regarding alleged federal crimes that occurred on 9/11. go to this URL and hear and learn the details. https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1383-lawyers-petition-for-9-11-grand-jury/ for more see: Irrefutable Evidence - The 9/11 Official Story is Total BS fourth edition send me an email at dick.mcmanus@yahoo.com and I will reply with it attach for free. or For sale at Amazon Kindle books https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=Some%20Unpopular%20History%20of%20the%20United%20States%20

Richard McManus Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:21 am

“The 9/11 attack was planned and direct in Afghanistan.” But how did NATO become involved in this war? NATO went to war with the US based on US classified information. But WHO ordered the 9/11 attacks? US Ambassador Frank Taylor the US’s Ambassador for Counter Terrorism briefed NATO country’s representative (Council) on Oct. 2, 2001 ALLEGING CONLUSIVELY the role of Al Qaeda’s and the TALEBAN regime rule in the 9/11 attack and the crash of UA flight 93 NATO Council members as a resulted voted to invoke Article 5 of the NATO/US treaty. Therein declaring WAR on Afghanistan. The Amb. Taylor briefing remained classified for nearly ten years allegedly proving Al Qaeda had directed the 9/11 attacks until April 5, 2009. Learn more here; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_LVbu7HCa0 more details here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Moz8hs2lJik Who was Amb. Francis X. "Frank" Taylor From July 1996 through July 1998 as commander of the Headquarters of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations at Bolling Air Force Base (and later at Andrews Air Force Base) where he was responsible for the US Air Force’s investigations of fraud, counterintelligence, and major criminal matters. Brigadier General Taylor (USAF) retired from active duty on July 1, 2001. Taylor subsequently held this office from July 13, 2001 until November 15, 2002. In this role, he was responsible for implementing U.S. counterterrorism policy overseas and coordinating the U.S. government response to international terrorist activities. In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, he was a key advisor in assisting the President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell in forming the international coalition against terrorism and developing aggressive international policy implementation to defeat terrorism. Was he the African American fast tracked in the USAF Bush’s token Black man? ( anything is possible when looking into the 9/11 mystery) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_X._Taylor The Authorization for Use of Military Force AUMF has also been cited by a wide variety of US officials as justification for continuing US military actions all over the world. Often the phrases "Al-Qaeda and associated forces" or "affiliated forces" have been used by these officials. However, that phrase does not appear in the AUMF. the AUMF has been used to allow military action in Afghanistan, the Philippines, Georgia, Yemen, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Iraq, and Somalia. IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons. How did Bush determine Al Qaeda and the TALIBAN regime did 9/11?

Richard McManus Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:22 am

Why did the State Department make note of some classified information regarding United Airlines flight 93 in the above posted comment? Did someone want to make sure the voice with an Arab accent was heard? One thing that really hit me as suspicious was the radio conversation between the air traffic controller and the alleged hijacker who voice had an Arab sounding accent. The radio conversation was tape record by the FAA. As I have worked using a radio, I know someone can jam a radio transmission if he/she is closer to the air traffic controller's location. Now why is this important? Because the alleged hijacker has been reported to have mistakenly turned on flight 93's (which crashed in Pennsylvania) intercom and told the passenger that he had a bomb and for everyone to remain seated (or something to that affect/effect.) After this radio message was heard by the air traffic controller, he has a conversation with other airline pilots in the general area and from their conversation, it was very likely the hijackers message was not recorded by the FAA audio tape recorder. Because the alleged hijacker needed to make damn sure the world heard his faked mistake in the intercom, he again transmits his fake conversation about a bomb, etc. 9:28 United 93 acknowledged a transmission from an FAA center controller. This was the last normal contact the FAA had with United 93. 9:29 A Cleveland Center controller and pilots of aircraft in the vicinity heard "a radio transmission of unintelligible sounds of possible screaming or a struggle from an unknown origin…" The controller responded, seconds later: "Somebody call Cleveland?" This was followed by a second radio transmission, with sounds of screaming and someone yelling "Get out of here, get out of here," again from an unknown source. The Cleveland Center air traffic controller began to try to identify the possible source of the transmissions, and noticed that United 93 had descended some 700 feet. The controller attempted to raise United 93 several times, with no response. 9:30 The controller began to poll the other flights on his frequency to determine if they heard the screaming; several said they had. 9:32 A third radio transmission came over the frequency: "Keep remaining sitting. We have a bomb on board." The controller understood, but chose to respond: "Calling Cleveland center, you're unreadable. Say again, slowly." At this point, IN MY OPINION, the fakers of this radio transmission were not sure their message about screaming and a bomb was heard and its was extremely important to the whole 9/11 story to have audio evidence on tape at the FAA. He notified his supervisor, who passed the notice up the chain of command. 9:39 A fifth radio transmission came over the radio frequency from United 93: THE ALLEGED HIJACKER: Uh, is the captain. Would like you all to remain seated. There is a bomb on board and are going back to the airport, and to have our demands [unintelligible]. Please remain quiet. The controller responded: "United 93, understand you have a bomb on board. Go ahead." The flight did not respond. You can listen to exact radio transmissions on this U-tube. So we are lead to believe the alleged hijacker did not realize he had not made a mistake in using the radio vs. the intercom. http://qandahar.tv/videos-september-pentagon-truth--%5Bae63iivRHt8%5D.cfm

Dominic Jermano Wednesday, September 26, 2018 8:51 am

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/911-inside-job-refusal-release-taxes-president-criminal-jermano/