Could Terrorists Living in Caves in Afghanistan Executed 9/11

Evidence

Evidence


(There is "1" article in this section)

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." ~ John Adams

What About Building 7?

What About Building 7?

The collapse of WTC Building 7 represents one of the worst structural failures in modern history. The official story contends that fires weakened the structures, resulting in a gravitational collapse. The evidence, obvious to so many researchers but omitted from NIST's Final Report, supports a very different conclusion – one that points squarely to explosive controlled demolition.

If WTC 7 was intentionally brought down, then clearly it becomes a 'smoking gun" that must be investigated. Who were the terrorists that had access to this highly secure building, occupied in part by the CIA, FBI, Dept of Defense, IRS, SEC, and others, and the technology required to prepare it for demolition?

View items...
What About WTC 1 and WTC 2?

What About WTC 1 and WTC 2?

In less than fifteen seconds World Trade Center One and World Trade Center Two exploded into a pile of rubble ejecting multi-ton perimeter wall sections 600 feet laterally impaling some of them in adjacent buildings. 

The questions we have to ask is:

  • Can high rise steel framed buildings be destroyed in a gravity-only collapse in a matter of seconds? (Answer: No)
  • Can the light weight top of the tallest steel high-rise buildings in the world fall through their massive structure which provides the path of maximum resistance to their decent? (Answer: No)
  • Can jet fuel or office fires reach temperatures high enough to significantly weaken or melt the highest quality structural steel? (Answer: No)
  • Wasn't it true that World Trade Center building One and Two were designed to withstand the impacts of airliners because of the fact that a B-25 bomber impacted the Empire State building at the 80th floor in 1945? (Answer: Yes)
  • Isn't it also true that the collapse of World Trade Center Building One and Two displayed several characteristics consistent with controlled demolition? (Answer:Yes)

This section will provide video, audio, written presentations and analysis about the physical evidence to answers these questions and more.

View items...
What About the Pentagon?

What About the Pentagon?

The 9/11 Truth Action Project does not have position about what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11

View items...
What About the Anthrax?

What About the Anthrax?

The Bush Administration wanted the Patriot Act passed quickly but two Senators, Tom Daschle (D-South Dakota) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) were holding it up because they recognized the vast implications of the Patriot Act. Then on October 9, 2001, letters containing sophisticated militarized grade anthrax were sent to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle.

Prior to this letters containing militarized anthrax spores that could have only have been developed in U.S. military labs, were sent to ABC News, CBS News, the New York Post and American Media, Inc on September 18, 2001.

No one was ever charged in connection with the Anthrax attack though this attack appears on its face to have been an attempt to send a message to any that opposed the radical new legislation being introduced in the Congress to think carefully before opposing it.

This section therefore carefully examines all the evidence available related to the Anthrax Attacks.

View items...
What About Freefall?

What About Freefall?

David chandler, a high school physics teacher instructs us, that "Newton's third law says that when objects interact, they always exert equal and opposite forces on each other. therefore, while an object is falling, if the falling top of the building exerts any force on objects in its path, those objects must push back with equal force slowing the fall." This implies that in order for the top of World Trade Center Building 7 to fall to the ground at free-fall there could be no structure for it to impact below the top. The only way the structure could be removed below the top would be through a process of controlled explosive demolition with something like RDX or HMX explosives in combination with Nano-thermite. This further implies that whoever conceived of the 9/11 attacks would have had to place the explosives in World Trade Center Building 7 weeks or months in advance of 9/11. World Trade Center Building 7, however, is one of the most secure buildings in lower Manhattan because it housed the Internal Revenue Service Regional Council, the U.S. Secret Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York City Office of Emergency Management.

View items...
What About Controlled Demolition?

What About Controlled Demolition?

The destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 were the largest structural failures in modern history. The official story, as told by the 9/11 Commission and NIST, claims that fires weakened the structures, causing all three buildings to collapse. However, the evidence, most of which was omitted from official reports, supports a very different conclusion: explosive controlled demolition.

View items...
What About Nanothermite – Iron Microspheres?

What About Nanothermite – Iron Microspheres?

Starting in 2007, a group of independent researchers began examining the dust from the World Trade Center disaster to see if identifiable residues might help explain the highly energetic destruction that was observed in the videos. Naked-eye and microscopic examination revealed numerous tiny metallic and magnetically attracted spheres and red/gray chips, quite distinctive in the dust samples.

The existence of iron-rich microspheres in the WTC dust was documented in 2004 and 2005. But nothing yet had been published about the red/gray chips in the dust until Steven Jones first described them in 2007. What might have been misinterpreted as the residue of common paint when seen with the naked eye proved to be a highly energetic advanced nano-composite material when viewed under a Scanning Electron Microscope.

View items...
What About Confronting NIST?

What About Confronting NIST?

David is best known in the 9/11 Truth Movement for proving that NIST lied in denying that Building 7 underwent freefall. Freefall is a literal smoking gun for controlled demolition.

The DVD, "The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception" is now available from pressfortruth.ca and has been uploaded to YouTube. See the tab in the main menu above or click here to view the whole DVD broken into an introduction and day-by-day segments.

View items...
What About the Fires – Molten Metal?

What About the Fires – Molten Metal?

Extremely high temperatures were evident before and during the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and at Ground Zero. Seven minutes before the destruction of the South Tower, a flow of molten metal appeared, accompanied by several smaller flows, as documented by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The material's glowing color showed that its temperature was close to "white hot" at the very beginning of the flow and "yellow-orange" further down. Iron-rich spheres in the WTC dust are additional proof of temperatures above the melting point of iron. Pyroclastic-like, rapidly expanding dust clouds after the destruction of the Towers can also be explained only by the expansion of hot gases.

View items...
What About United Airlines Flight 93?

What About United Airlines Flight 93?

This section will provide the best evidence of what happened to United Airlines flight 93 (Flight 93) on the morning of September 11, 2001. Conflicting eyewitness accounts don't help in arriving at a clear picture of what happened that morning, so here we will delve into what was actually discovered at the crash site and leave speculation to others. It wold have been helpful if we would have been able to acquire the information contained in the the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder, but the FBI to this day refuses to release that information claiming that there is still an ongoing investigation into the hijacking and crash of Flight 93. This leaves us with two prevailing hypothesis, that either Flight 93 was shot down, or it crashed as a result of a struggle between passengers and the hijackers in the cockpit. We will leave it to you to make up your own mind as to what really happened.

View items...
What About the Architects and Engineers?

What About the Architects and Engineers?

Architects and Engineers around the world are endeavoring to address the unanswered questions of the September 11, 2001 attacks through scientific research and public education. This section presents the strongest most credible research available from these architectural and engineering and researchers, who are some of the top in their respective fields. The results from their studies paints a picture very different from what the U.S. Federal Government agencies and commissions "declared" to be the facts surrounding those attacks.

View items...
What About the Scientists?

What About the Scientists?

Scientists and Scholars around the world are endeavoring to address the unanswered questions of the September 11, 2001 attacks through scientific research and public education. This section presents the strongest most credible research available from these scientists and researchers, who are some of the top in their respective fields. The results from their studies paints a picture very different from what the U.S. Federal Government agencies and commissions "declared" to be the facts surrounding those attacks.

View items...
What Do the Social Sciences Professionals have to Say?

What Do the Social Sciences Professionals have to Say?

In this section we will listen to, watch and read what psychologists and sociologists have to say about our reluctance to fully embrace the evidence of 9/11.

We will come to understand that questioning the official account of 9/11 is actually patriotic, that our resistance to accepting the truth issues from what psychologists call cognitive dissonance where when presented two conflicting views of reality and one of those views challenges our basic view of country and world, that we instinctively choose the view that doesn't threaten our world view.

Psychologists, however are also clear that we can't begin to heal as individuals or as a nation until we embrace the truth and hold accountable those that caused our pain.

View items...
What About the Firefighters?

What About the Firefighters?

Tis section presents videos, audio recordings, printed material and physical evidence assembled by firefighters and affiliates with the intention to increase awareness, provide public education, demand a real investigation that follows National Standards, and provide support to their brothers and sisters in need.

Here you will learn that there is overwhelming evidence of obstruction of justice, and destruction of evidence voiced even by numerous 9/11 Commissioners themselves; i.e., Senator Max Cleland resigned from the Commission stating, "This investigation is now compromised."

The truth is important in order for us to be instructed in the manner of how to construct buildings that remain safe even in the case of fire. Prior to September 11, 2001, Architects, Engineers, and Firefighters were confident that fires could never cause a steel framed building to completely collapse, as the only time that ever occurred was on that infamous date.

View items...
What About the Pilots?

What About the Pilots?

This section presents videos, audio recordings, references to printed material and references to physical evidence assembled by  pilots throughout the world who have gathered together for this one purpose. The goal is to arrive at the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001 from the perspective of the decades of the combined experience of all the pilots examining the flight data recorder information, RADES software and files that plots the radar tracks of all air traffic, NORAD and FAA audio recordings and airliner aerodynamics V-G (velocity vs G-load) diagrams. The four flights American Airlines 11, United Airlines 175, American Airlines 77 and United Airlines 93 are the the subject of this section.

View items...
What About Law Enforcement?

What About Law Enforcement?

This section presents videos, audio recordings, printed documents, and any available physical evidence that law enforcement across the nation has reviewed, investigated and commented on. Many in the law enforcement community have observed that the criminal attacks of 9/11 may not be an isolated event, because 9/11 was the pretext for the Patriot Act, the indefinite detention provisions of the 2012 NDAA and other policy changes that have affected domestic policing across the country. Because law enforcement officers take an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, investigating criminal acts that set the stage for the revocation of provisions of the Constitution, is their sworn duty. Please take the time to read about all of the investigations concerned police officers have engaged in so that justice for the American people may be served.

View items...
What About the Military Officers?

What About the Military Officers?

This section presents videos, audio recordings, printed documents and an examination of physical evidence by Commissioned and Non-commissioned Officers in the U.S. military, who took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; who further pledged to bear true faith and allegiance to the same. It is their duty as officers to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard that may be or how long it takes. It is therefore the further purpose of this section to demonstrate that there is no statute of limitations for getting full accountability for what took place on September 11, 2001 and restoring the rights of every American citizen once that accountability is gotten.

View items...
What About the Lawyers?

What About the Lawyers?

The section will present videos, audio recordings, books papers and articles produced by or including discussions by lawyers who are trained to value the Constitution and the rule of law. The unique perspective that lawyers bring to the examination of evidence pertaining to 9/11 is that they are trained to examine evidence and to spot cover-ups or inconsistencies in the evidence and bias in witnesses or decision-makers. Attorneys are also experts in weighing conflicting evidence. Because of this, this section will let you see the evidence from the perspective of a lawyers training and provide you an understanding of why so many lawyers have concluded that the 9/11 Commission and other government examinations were wholly inadequate, and did not follow proper rules of evidence or procedure.

View items...
What About the Intelligence Community?

What About the Intelligence Community?

This section will provide videos, audio recordings, printed dossiers, books and articles and references to physical evidence that has been reviewed and analyzed by the Intelligence Community. You will learn in this section from the Intelligence Officers that the tragic events of 9/11 have been used to justify the unending "war on terror", illegal wars in the Middle East in which millions of innocent people have been maimed, killed and displaced, and the erosion of our traditional freedoms and values. Furthermore, in the name of protecting national security post-9/11, spy agencies across the world have been given sweeping new powers and resources. Their intelligence has been politicized to build a case for the disastrous war in Iraq, they are failing to stop terrorist attacks, and they have colluded in illegal acts of internment, kidnapping and torture.

View items...
What About Directed Energy Weapons?

What About Directed Energy Weapons?

This section will provide videos, audio recordings, printed documents and presentations of physical evidence that will show that the the amount of energy required to vaporize the steel in the upper 110 floors of just one of the World Trade Center towers in the approximately 10 seconds it took to completely disintegrate to the ground, would be 4x1013 Watts. This is four times the total power output of the entire earth, including all carbon combustion, nuclear power, wind power, hydroelectric power, etc.. Additionally if you take into account losses from scattering and absorption in the atmosphere, reflection off aluminum and steel in the building, and inefficiencies from storing this huge amount of energy and generating photons, then the power required would swell to at least thousands of earths worth of power, strongly indicating that the use of any kind of directed energy weapons to destroy the World Trade Center Highrise towers on September 11, 2001 had a vanishing small probability of occurrence and for all practical purposes can be ruled out as one of the possible causes for the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings.

View items...
What About Nuclear Detonations?

What About Nuclear Detonations?

Some have hypothesized that nuclear or thermonuclear devices could account for the spectacular explosion of World Trade Center Building 1 (WTC 1) and World Trade Center Building 2 (WTC 2) on September 11, 2001.

The arguments made for this mode of explosive demolition of WTC 1 and WTC 2 is that there were elevated levels of tritium found in and around the debris pile of the former World Trade Center highrises and that there were vast pools of molten metal found by the firefighters working in the ruble pile weeks after the collapse of the highrises.

The elevated Tritium levels, though not significantly greater than background concentrations, can be explained by the use of tritium radio-luminescent devices used in the World Trade Center Complex at the time

The molten metal discovered "running down the channel rails" by the firefighters can be explained by the presence of thermitic compounds present in all the dust samples that can burn work weeks underground without oxygen at temperatures significantly greater than the melting point of steel.

Also if thermonuclear charges were place in the sub-basements of WTC 1 and WTC 2 all of the sub-basements would have been completely destroyed which contradicts the evidence since there are photos of the sub-basement after the destruction of both towers that show the sub-basements had surprisingly sustained little damage from the collapse of the towers. Additionally there were people in the sub-basements, when WTC 1 and WTC 2 were destroyed, who would have been vaporized by a thermonuclear detonation but instead live to give testimony of the explosions they did experience prior to the collapse of the highrises.

View items...
Introduction

Introduction

On September 11, 2001, the three worst structural failures in modern history took place when World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 suffered complete and rapid destruction. Also on that day the Pentagon, the most heavily defended building complex in the world, was struck by a Boeing 757 commercial airliner inflicting catastrophic damage.

In the aftermath of the tragedy, most members of the architecture and engineering community, as well as the general public, assumed that the buildings’ destruction had occurred as a result of the airplane impacts and fires. This view was reinforced by the 2005 and 2008 reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7. In 2002 the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) published a review of the damage and structural performance of Pentagon on 9/11 in its Building Performance Report.

Since 9/11, however, independent researchers around the world have assembled a large body of evidence that overwhelmingly refutes the notion that airplane impacts and fires caused the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. In addition, reporters on the scene in New York documented eyewitness testimony of secondary explosions. This body of evidence, which FEMA and NIST omitted from their reports, supports the troubling conclusion that all three skyscrapers were destroyed in a process known as “controlled demolition,” where explosives and/or other devices are used to bring down a building.

View items...
anthrax attacks

anthrax attacks

On September 16 and 17, 2008, the House and Senate Judiciary Committees respectively, conducted “Amerithrax oversight” hearings consisting of questioning FBI Director Robert Mueller. Despite widespread concern about the integrity of Amerithrax, the colloquy during these hearings was largely feeble. Congressman Nadler did manage to ask the $64,000 question. Salon.com journalist Glen Greenwald recounted this as follows: “Nadler asked one of the most central questions in the anthrax case: he pointed out that the facilities that (unlike Ft. Detrick) actually have the equipment and personnel to prepare dry, silica-coated anthrax are: 1) the US Army’s Dugway Proving Ground and 2) the Battelle Corporation, the private CIA contractor that conducts substantial research into highly complex strains of anthrax.

View items...
There are many questions to ask about the war in Afghanistan. One that has been widely asked is whether it will turn out to be “Obama’s Vietnam.”[1] This question implies another: Is this war winnable, or is it destined to be a quagmire, like Vietnam? These questions are motivated in part by the widespread agreement that the Afghan government, under Hamid Karzai, is at least as corrupt and incompetent as the government the United States tried to prop up in South Vietnam for 20 years…