What Does Freefall Mean

Saturday, August 20, 2016

NIST Finally Admits Freefall, by David Chandler

Written by AE911Truth Staff

Published on Feb 16, 2013

In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at free fall, but the cover-up was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged free fall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. This video displays the brazenness of the NIST WTC7 cover-up.

[The WTC7 series has elicited a number of questions from people unclear on the details of how I did the measurements, compared to how NIST did them and how the representatives of NIST described their measurements. I have therefore created a WTC7 Measurement FAQ page: http://www.911speakout.org/WTC7-Measu...


I will also use this FAQ as a place of reference

for other questions that arise as well.]

Please watch the following video evidence and draw you own conclusions.

{jwplayer}&file=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGMvnwjUizY&type=youtube&title=WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Free-fall (Part I) by David Chandler&image=https://www.911tap.org/images/site/evidence/wtc7/nist-admits-freefall-part-1.jpg{/jwplayer}


{jwplayer}&file=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fvy7w139Hkc&type=youtube&title=WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Free-fall (Part II) by David Chandler&image=https://www.911tap.org/images/site/evidence/wtc7/nist-admits-freefall-part-2.jpg{/jwplayer}


{jwplayer}&file=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqucIFM7S1Y&type=youtube&title=WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Free-fall (Part III) by David Chandler&image=https://www.911tap.org/images/site/evidence/wtc7/nist-admits-freefall-part-3.jpg{/jwplayer}