Subscribe

Subscribe
No Yes	9/11 TAP Newsletter News Brought to You by the 9/11 Truth Action Project

9/11 Truth Action Project

Wednesday, April 18, 2018 6:03 pm

This attack can only have occurred in an environment in which decisions are made based on the ability to control the media – not the facts.

Tripartite Attack on Syria – Another Stepchild of 9/11; Government and Mainstream Media Willfully Misinform

911tap.org

The April 14th attack by the United States, Britain and France against Syria is another troubling incident stemming from the failure of a mainstream media that has never presented the true facts about 9/11

Comments

Ray Kraaijenhagen Monday, April 16, 2018 5:35 pm

Bobby, was killed by a powerful explosion as he was about to enter the lobby of the North Tower. That evidence is corroborated by the accounts of many FDNY members, police officers, and workers who reported that explosions went off in the lower parts of the towers before the buildings were leveled. Bobby McIlvaine died from a detonation, no report fully explains the explosion in the lobby. Jet fuel is not a high explosive. High explosives were used on that day, that can scientifically be determined. 9/11 is about science, 9/11 was never fully investigated. The reports that were written about that day leave out certain calculations. Calculations on explosions were never made, the magnitude of one explosion was roughly estimated by FEMA (not by NIST!), by clocking the duration of the fireball. A fire ball is not an explosion per se, it is the burning of a large amount of fuel in open air. Jet fuel burns, it does not detonate, bombs detonate, jet fuel can cause a deflagration under a perfect fuel air mix ratio, this is used to power jet engines. FEMA and NIST did not fully investigate the explosion down below. FEMA made an assumption as to what could have caused the damage in the basement and lobby areas. NIST did not investigate that part of the destruction. It focused on computer models to explain the initial collapse of the Twin Towers and focused on the upper levels where the planes entered. There is no OS that explains on a scientific basis what took place at lower levels in the towers. Understanding explosions, detonation and deflagration is at the heart of comprehending what did take place on that day. Please read the NIST and FEMA report, there is no calculation to be found on the magnitude of the explosions. Leaving out such critical data, is at the heart of the cover up. Leaving out essential details is the modus operandi of every cover up in history, we only have to look at is what happening today, Skripal, Syria, etc. The FEMA and NIST reports left out certain crucial details, that is provable in a court of law. https://www.ae911truth.org/news/276-news-media-events-a-father-s-search-for-truth-reveals-clues-to-a-controlled-demolition

9/11 Truth Action Project

Sunday, April 15, 2018 4:26 am

VIDEO: 911TAP Petition Collecting by Sander Hicks and Ross Muir How do you like to approach people out on the street about 9/11? Do you find it easy or hard? What do you say to start the conversation off -- "Hey, can I interest you in a discussion about the free fall collapse of Building 7 on 9/11?" Some people find it easy to do this, but probably not very many. What are you doing today to discuss 9/11 with strangers on the street? If you're doing little or nothing today, would it help if you had an easier approach? Well, here you go. Hold up your clipboard with petitions attached. Don't wear any clothing to suggest you're a 9/11 truther. As people approach, get them to stop with a, "Hey, you got a minute?" Some will stop, "Sure, what you got?" At this point, they don't know what your topic is, but they are ready for a rational discussion about a political topic. This is about as good as you can hope for. Now, there are many things you could say next, entirely to your liking. But it could be something as simple as, "We have a petition drive for a new 9/11 investigation. Would you like to sign our petition?" Even if you simply uttered this phrase and stopped there, you will quickly see a parting of humanity into the quick "Absolutely I'll sign!", "No, I'm good.", or somewhere in between, usually accompanied by stunned silence. Here, even if you just collected petitions from those who immediately want to sign, and handed out brochures to all who are interested, you will have done a great deal. Many of the people who sign will choose to receive 911TAP newsletters and action alerts, and some will volunteer to help out. This is how you can find people to work with you and grow your team, and GROW THE TRUTH MOVEMENT. Everyone taking home a brochure will receive a truth injection that way as well. Even the people who say "no" will have received the equivalent of a "Re-investigate 9/11" sign stuck in their face and the message that we are not going away. The following linked video features two of the best 911TAP petition collectors working the streets today: Sander Hicks and Ross Muir in New York City. They describe how they do it and give tips that everyone can try out. If you decide that you would like to give this a try yourself, 911TAP is ready to help and can set you up with the materials to get you started. Just enter a comment here or message me: David Fura Let's do this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEWHnYJTg0A&index=64&list=WL

Petitioning for TAP

youtube.com

Comments

9/11 Truth Action Project Saturday, April 14, 2018 5:44 am

And you can sign the 911TAP petition on-lne: www.911tap.org/petition

Simon Hunt Sunday, April 15, 2018 4:26 am

You need PR to promote the truth to counter the PR that's spun the lies.

9/11 Truth Action Project

Saturday, April 14, 2018 7:28 am

9/11 Truth movement has never had access to any legal venues for pursuing 9/11. This case, involving the Saudi money trail, has the hope of providing legal discovery. By pulling on loose threads, it is expected that the whole "official story" will unravel in a judicial environment. The "28 pages" provide the evidence that the FBI investigation was fraudulent by not following the Saudi money trail. In a judicial environment, this is a big deal. https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/734-9-11-case-against-saudis-moves-forward

9/11 Case Against Saudis Moves Forward; The Tide Has Turned

911tap.org

A motion to dismiss the Saudi's from a lawsuit filed by the 9/11 families was denied. This positive step forward would not have been possible without the release of the 28 pages and the subsequent passage of JASTA.

Comments

Jeremy Feit Tuesday, April 03, 2018 1:44 pm

Did the Saudis detonate the WTC or fly a missle into the Pentagon? Jackasses

Brian Murphy Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:33 pm

woo hoo

Melissa Dodd Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:42 pm

Saudi prince just met with Brian Grazer Bob Igor of Disney and Rupert Murdoch All in on 9/11? 28pages.org

Melissa Dodd Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:43 pm

911research.wtc7.net

Melissa Dodd Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:44 pm

Patriotsquestion911.com

Daphne Lee Tuesday, April 03, 2018 3:01 pm

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

David MacCormack Tuesday, April 03, 2018 3:07 pm

ae911truth.org building #7

Lynn Jensen Tuesday, April 03, 2018 3:22 pm

This is where I need to educate myself more. Thx Gene

Michiel Sallaets Tuesday, April 03, 2018 6:45 pm

Are you kidding me!? Have you ever heard about LOGIC!? Because you always frame the "real" criminals and then plant their Saudi passports and claim they were found in a pristine condition at ground Zero even after the airplanes got completely vaporised !! Then you claim the whole demolition was also by the ones who hijacked the planes and miraculously did all that !@#🤯 Whoever is involved in this from this organization was obviously bought by the criminals who committed the inside job like they bought most of government officials such as FEMA.. Civil organizations are no difference unfortunately. Unfollow - Unlike - Unsubscribe - Never donate.

Kolleen Weber Tuesday, April 03, 2018 6:52 pm

When will we hold Isreal and our own Government liable for their parts in this mass murder?

Richard McManus Tuesday, April 03, 2018 7:38 pm

Was Hoover capable of ordering the assassination of MLK –YES! And this and the JFK assassination were covered up since 1963 and 1968, so how about 9/11? In 1946, FBI agents in New York were investigating Bugsy Siegel and Frank Costello. They were getting together to come up with the financing for the Flamingo casino. But the New York FBI agents soon received an order from Truman's Attorney General, Tom Clark, to cease the investigation on the grounds it "lacked federal jurisdiction." It was later learned that Nevada’s US Senator Pat McCarran had interceded on behalf of his newly emerging Las Vegas mafia. Senator McCaran charged that the FBI investigation had been designed to "damage the economy" of Nevada. According to Anthony Summers, the author of The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover (1993): oilmen had started cultivating him in the late forties-inviting him to Texas as a houseguest, taking him on hunting expeditions. Hoover and his boyfriend, Clyde Tolson were regular visitors to Murchison's Del Charro Hotel in La Jolla, California. Allan Witwer, the manager of the hotel at the time, later recalled: Witwer estimates that over the next 18 summers Murchison's hospitality in $100-a-day suites and including meals was worth nearly $300,000. ($2,520,000 in 2018 dollars). He was friends with Walter Winchell, who was extremely close to many gangsters, including Frank Costello, and he regularly spent time at clubs frequented by gangsters. Hoover’s daily lunch tab at an expensive Washington restaurant was picked up by a friend who owned a large laundry service. Furthermore, he claimed that his annual trips to California were official FBI “inspection trips,” so they were paid for by taxpayers. Hoover had also invested in oil companies and railroads owned by Murchison and Richardson. The FBI was responsible for renovations and new furniture for his house. The head of Federal Narcotics Bureau (FNB), Harry Anslinger stated that the CIA and Hoover subverted a grand jury that had been convened in Miami to probe the financial affairs of dozens of top mobsters. (The Strength of the Wolf, pgs. 260- 261) In 1955 a Senate committee discovered that 20 per cent of the Murchison Oil Lease Company was owned by Vito Genovese and his family. The committee also discovered Murchison had close financial ties with Carlos Marcello. In 1958 Murchison purchased the publishers, Henry Holt and Company. One of the first book's he published was by his old friend, J. Edgar Hoover. The book, Masters of Deceit: The Story of Communism in America (1958) was an account of the Communist menace and sold over 250,000 copies in hardcover and over 2,000,000 in paperback. It was on the best-seller lists for thirty-one weeks. Hoover had invested millions of dollars in Murchison Oil Company. As might be expected, that kind of money wielded enormous political power, and not just in Texas; then congressman Lyndon Johnson was bought and sold by Texas Big Oil, a feat that was apparently not so hard to accomplish. Likewise, in the days before campaign finance reform, Dwight Eisenhower owed a great deal to Big Oil, in particular from investing in wells drilled by his new best friend Sid Richardson. As author Burrough relates it, through an old family friend: “There's an old game in oil, you know, where your friends, they only invest in your good wells, not the bad wells? You understand? It was that way with Eisenhower. You never could prove it. But he did it. I know he did. Sid told me.” (Source: The Rise and Fall of the Greatest Texas Oil Fortunes by Bryan Burrough http://www.weeklystandard.com/liquid-assets/article/272299 http://historyonfilm.com/j-edgar-hoover/ Jeremy M. Jacobs, Sr. is the son of Jewish immigrants from Poland. The Jacobs crime family was originally from Buffalo, NY and they got rich bootlegging during Prohibition as partners with the Canadian Bronfmans crime family. In May 1972, the Jacobs’ Sportservice was convicted of a federal conspiracy charge for attempting to hide its ownership of share in the Frontier hotel and casino in Las Vegas. His three sons have taken over running their crime family called Sportservice which is a New York based company (now called Delaware North). It is the largest nonpublic, family-owned corporations in the world, a conglomerate with control or partial control over 450 separate companies. Its stated annual profit is $350 million, from holdings in North American and British sports complexes, race tracks, and food consortia. On June 3, 1976, Don Bolles an investigative reporter for the Republic was murdered due to a bomb planted under his car. He had been investigating the likely illegal relationships between Arizona racing regulators and the tracks owned by the Jacobs family. In 1972 the Democratic Party members of the House Select Panel on Crime decided to terminate their hearings on Sportservice . US Senator Robert Dole, (R-KS) revealed that the decision had followed a private meeting between Jeremy Jacobs and Democratic National Committee Chairman Larry O'Brien. O'Brien subsequently left his Democratic Party post and assumed a lucrative job as president of the National Basketball Association—an organization with heavy representation by the Jacobs family. Senator Dole publicly protested the decision by the House Select Panel. Five-term Arizona Congressman Sam Steiger denounced the Democrats exposing Sportservice’s ties to organized crime. Max and Jeremy Jacobs admitted in congressional testimony, that their company hired New York public relations man Hal Antin to defeat Steiger in his 1976 re-election bid. A Phoenix underworld figure, George H. Johnson, was paid to wiretap and manufacture scandals against Steiger, and he lost his re-election for a sixth term. (Source: May 24, 1972 issue of Sports Illustrated "Jacobs — Godfather of Sports) https://exploringrealhistory.blogspot.com/2017/11/part-3-final-judgmentthe-missing-link.html The truth about the US military's and J. Edgar Hoover's involvement in the assassination of Martin L. King. If you go to the below link you can listen to author William Pepper summarized his new book and how he uncovered the truth. https://www.corbettreport.com/william-pepper-reveals-the-plot-to-kill-king/ More detailed research on how they set up James Earl Ray as a patsy. http://rense.com/general19/part.htm Kennedys And King - William F. Pepper, The Plot to Kill King: The Truth Behind the Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.

David Scott Lowen Tuesday, April 03, 2018 9:06 pm

The "28 pages" we're a well planned distraction from the real zionist 911 perps . We know they plan years , decades in advance .

Chris Cerullo Thursday, April 05, 2018 12:07 pm

The "ILLUMNATI" - aka - "New World Order", is solely responsible for 9/11 & these endless Wars, in both the Middle East & Africa.....! Put the blame to the rightful & Evil People & "Not" blame Countries or it's people....! Amen to the Truth....!

Eric Dawkins Friday, April 06, 2018 8:35 am

Israeli MOSSAD did this! I'm sure the Saudis were fully aware of the whole operation, as they are "Donmeh" Crypto Jews, and the US government was all in on it too.

Steve Hinton Friday, April 06, 2018 8:39 am

Israel helped....

Amanda Robinson Barnard Monday, April 09, 2018 4:29 pm

Guy Canale your post made me want to go and search myself! This is the first thing that came up when I searched. And by the way I typed it really fast to see what it would do

Alan Gough Monday, April 09, 2018 9:25 pm

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lawyers-and-911-victim-family-members-file-doj-petition-demanding-911-grand-jury-investigation-of-new-evidence-300625964.html

Nathan Reid Saturday, April 14, 2018 7:28 am

9/11 missiles or planes? https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=228777307858733&id=100021793971126

9/11 Truth Action Project

Saturday, April 14, 2018 3:39 am

ANNOUNCEMENT: February Results for 911TAP Petition Project The 911TAP Petition Project is a vehicle to help lawfully and peacefully replace the U.S. Congress with a Truth-friendly Congress, in order to fund an independent 9/11 investigation worth paying for. The short term objective is to unify the 9/11 Truth movement into collective action and get everyone working harder, and together, on concrete teaching & recruiting activities. The intermediate goal is to achieve a petition count displayed on the 911TAP website that will boost the morale of the 9/11 Truth movement and give us greater confidence, and, again, motivate us to work even harder. As the petition count gets very high it will improve our credibility in the eyes of the general public and demonstrate to the world, and ourselves, that the 9/11 Truth movement has become a political force to be reckoned with. On February 28, 2018 there were 2,838 signers of the 911TAP petition. The February position breakdown is unchanged from the previous monthly rankings, except for a big move by Arizona to take over the number 4 position. Oregon increased its lead and remains in the top spot, while New York keeps its position at number 2. The following list has the full top-10. Oregon 1081 New York 330 California 225 Arizona 127 Washington 121 Florida 76 Massachusetts 54 Texas 45 Colorado 43 Pennsylvania 41 We need your help! Join us by signing the 911TAP petition. Volunteer for "Local Action Teams" if you want to work with paper petitions in your area. You will get plenty of help to get started. www.911TAP.org/petition/

Comments

Adam Fitzgerald Saturday, March 10, 2018 4:04 am

So in your opinion, who do you believe orchestrated the attacks of 9/11?

Richard McManus Sunday, March 11, 2018 4:21 am

2,965 architects and engineers, http://www.ae911truth.org some 600 PhD scientists and some 350 skilled commercial airplane pilots believe the World Trade Center buildings collapsed due to explosion, the official story is full of BS, and the corporate media is grossly negligence in not reporting the truth, we want a new public Congressional investigation of 9/11. Here is a summary of the evidence. 16 miracles related to 9/11 1. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 were the only steel-framed high-rise buildings ever to come down without explosives or incendiaries. 2. The Twin Towers, each of which had 287 steel columns, were brought down solely by a combination of airplane strikes and jet-fuel fires. 3. WTC 7 was not hit by a plane, ever before or after 9/11 has a steel high rise building (47 stories) ever collapsed due to fire and many burnt total from ground up to the top for way longer than five hours (think all day!) 4. WTC 7 collapsed in absolute free fall – for over two seconds. 5. The collapses imitated the kinds of implosions that can be induced only by demolition companies. 6. In the case of WTC 7, the structure came down symmetrically (straight down, with an almost perfectly horizontal roofline), which meant that all 82 of the steel support columns had to fall simultaneously, although the building’s fires had a very asymmetrical pattern. 7. The South Tower’s upper 30-floor block changed its angular momentum in midair after tipping some 22 degree. Yet the laws of physics says it should have toppled completely off the side of the Tower and landed on the ground in one big chuck. 8. This 30 floor block then disintegrated from the bottom like a cube of button on a hot frying pan. 9. With regard to the North Tower, some of its steel columns were ejected out horizontally for at least 500 feet. 10. The oxygen starved fires in the pile of debris from the WTC buildings could not be extinguished for many months. Almost 12 weeks after September 11th, there was at least one fire still burning in the rubble – it is the longest-burning structural fire in history. After five days of cooling and despite being sprayed with water, they were still above the melting point of aluminum. A thermal map of Ground Zero created from infrared data collected by a NASA plane that overflew the site on September 16th. The map, created by the U.S. Geological Survey, shows hot spots on the surface of the rubble that were above 1,292 degrees F. FIVE DAYS AFTER THE COLLAPSE! Yet the fire fighters poured water on the surface of the wreckage for five days prior to this survey. Impossible for a normal hydrocarbon fire. Any fire underneath the surface of the wreckages was oxygen starved given all the fine concrete dust within the wreckage and water. And debris stated on fire when exposed by air during the cleaning up of the wreckage. 11. Although the WTC fires, based on ordinary building fires, could not have produced temperatures above 1,800℉, the fires inexplicably melted metals with much higher melting points, such as iron (2,800℉) and even molybdenum (4,753℉). http://journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf Yet the block smoke coming off the Twin Towers is evidence of a relatively cool fire of at most some 1,000 degree F. and with a nine mph cool breeze blowing thru the building. 12. A compound called nano thermite was found in at least four sample of the dust (power) were collected on September 11th 2001 around collapsed Twin Towers. This compound was in the form of red and gray microscopic chips. The chemical signature of many of the WTC dust spheres also "strikingly" matches that of the microscopic iron spheres found after testing a sample of nano-thermite chips. This chemical compound was invented by Lawerence Livermore Labs a year or so prior to 9/11. Microscopic iron spheres are always produced when nano thermite ignited when heated to a start the chemical reaction, just like heat from friction ignites a match. And It burns at some $5,000 F. Air pressures cause the spherical shape, just like air pressure forms rain drops. 13. Some of the steel in the debris had been sulfidized, resulting in Swiss-cheese-appearing steel, even though ordinary building fires could not have resulted in the sulfidation. Thermate is chemical compound when mixed contains sulfur becomes thermite and nano-thermite, contains sulfur. 14. These World Trade Center buildings also came down in free fall – the Twin Towers in virtual free fall. But “virtual” is meant too fast if a real collapse with crushing of upper floors onto lower floors had occurred, therefore, a logical explanation at least some explosions happened and not only crushing of steel on steel. 15. As a passenger on AA Flight 77, Barbara Olson called her husband, telling him about hijackers on her plane, even though this plane had no onboard phones and its altitude was too high for a cell phone call to get through.

Richard McManus Sunday, March 11, 2018 4:22 am

16. Hijacker pilot Hani Hanjour could not possibly have flown the trajectory of AA 77 to strike Wedge 1 of the Pentagon, and yet he did. Why some 350 skilled commercial airplane pilots want a new investigation So here is a one aeronautical engineer and a pilot argument explains why none of the alleged 19 hijacker could have flown the four 9/11 jets. They had proved to be too incompetent to fly a little Cessna 172 single. There are some who maintain that the mythical 9/11 hijackers, although had acquired the impressive skills that enabled them to fly airliners by training in flight simulators. What follows is an attempt to bury this myth once and for all, because I’ve heard this ludicrous explanation bandied about, ad nauseam, on the Internet and the TV networks—invariably by people who know nothing substantive about flight simulators, flying, or even airplanes. A common misconception non-pilots have about simulators is how “easy” it is to operate them. They are indeed relatively easy to operate if the objective is to make a few lazy turns and frolic about in the “open sky”. But if the intent in using the simulator is to execute any kind of a maneuver with even the least bit of precision, the task immediately becomes quite daunting. And if the aim is to navigate to a specific geographic location hundreds of miles away while flying at over 500 MPH, 30,000 feet above the ground the challenges become virtually impossible for an untrained pilot. For one, even touching the steering wheel (the yoke) of the airplane slightly at some 500 mph will put the airplane way off course. For a person not conversant with the practical complexities of pilotage, a modern flight simulator could present a terribly confusing and disorienting experience. These complex training devices are not even remotely similar to the video games one sees in amusement arcades, or even the software versions available for home computers. In order to operate a modern flight simulator with any level of skill, one has to not only be a decent pilot to begin with, but also a skilled instrument-rated one to boot — and be thoroughly familiar with the actual aircraft type the simulator represents, since the cockpit layouts vary between aircraft. Once you’ve rotated, climbed out, and reached cruising altitude in a simulator (or real airplane), and find yourself en route to some distant destination (using sophisticated electronic navigation techniques), the situation changes drastically: the pilot loses virtually all external visual reference cues, and is left entirely at the mercy of an array of complex flight and navigation instruments to provide situational cues (altitude, heading, speed, attitude, etc.) At some 30,000 feet above the ground is a lot different than flying at some 3,000 feet at 500 mph vs. following a highway flying a Cessna by looking out the airplane window at some 100 mph. In the case of a Boeing 757 or 767, the pilot would be faced with an EFIS (Electronic Flight Instrumentation System) panel comprised of six large multi-mode LCDs interspersed with clusters of assorted “hard” instruments. These displays process the raw aircraft system and flight data into an integrated picture of the aircraft situation, position and progress, not only in horizontal and vertical dimensions, but also with regard to time and speed as well. If one cannot translate this information quickly, precisely and accurately (and it takes an instrument-rated pilot to do so), one would have ZERO SITUATIONAL AWARENESS. I.e., the pilot wouldn’t have a clue where s/he was in relation to the earth. And know where the FAA radar coverage was so poor when he made his 360 degree making a turn-around to head back to New York City, could not be seen after he turned off the transponder. Flight under such conditions is referred to as “IFR”, or Instrument Flight Rules. Let me place this in the context of the 9/11 hijacker-pilots. These men were repeatedly deemed incompetent to solo a simple Cessna-172 — an elementary exercise that involves flying this little trainer once around the patch on a sunny day. A student’s first solo flight involves a simple circuit: take-off, followed by four gentle left turns ending with a landing back on the runway. This is as basic as flying can possibly get. Not one of the hijackers was deemed fit to perform this most elementary exercise by himself. In fact, here’s what their flight instructors had to say about the aptitude of these budding aviators: Mohammed Atta: “His attention span was zero.” https://www.willthomas.net/911/911_Commission_Hearing.htm Khalid Al-Mihdhar: “We didn’t kick him out, but he didn’t live up to our standards.” https://100777.com/node/237 Marwan Al-Shehhi: “He was dropped because of his limited English and incompetence at the controls.” https://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/9-11/9-11_hijackers_still_alive.htm Salem Al-Hazmi: “We advised him to quit after two lessons.” https://www.willthomas.net/Books_Videos/911_Investigations_Stand_Down.htm Hani Hanjour: “His English was horrible, and his mechanical skills were even worse. It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.” https://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hanjour.html

Richard McManus Sunday, March 11, 2018 4:22 am

Now let’s take a look at American Airlines Flight 77 that allegedly flew into the Pentagon. Passenger/hijacker Hani Hanjour presumably rises from his seat midway through the flight, viciously fights his way into the cockpit with his cohorts, overpowers Captain Charles F. Burlingame and First Officer David Charlebois, and somehow manages to toss them out of the cockpit (for starters, very difficult to achieve in a cramped environment without inadvertently impacting (slightly touching) the yoke and thereby disengaging the autopilot). One would correctly presume that this would present considerable difficulties to a little chap with a box cutter—Burlingame was a tough, burly, ex-Vietnam F4 fighter jock who had flown over 100 combat missions. Every pilot who knows him says that rather than politely hand over the controls, Burlingame would have instantly rolled the plane on its back so that Hanjour would have broken his neck when he hit the floor. But let’s ignore this almost natural reaction expected of a fighter pilot and proceed with this charade. Imagine that Hanjour overpowers the flight deck crew, removes them from the cockpit and takes his position in the captain’s seat. The weather reports say it was fairly clear, so let’s say Hanjour experienced a perfect Ceiling and Visibility Unlimited day. Below him is a murky brownish-grey-green landscape, virtually devoid of any significant surface detail, while the aircraft he was now piloting was moving along, almost imperceptibly and in eerie silence, at around 500 mph. He wouldn’t have had a clue as to where, precisely, he was. There’s nothing there to give him any real visual cues. Mr. Hanjour would be forced to divert his attention to his instrument panel, where he’d be faced with a bewildering array of instruments—nothing like he had seen in a Cessna 172. He would then have to very quickly interpret his heading, ground track, altitude, and airspeed information on the displays before he could even figure out where in the world he was, much less where the Pentagon was located in relation to his position. After all, before he can crash into a target, he has to first find the target. But, for the sake of discussion let’s stretch things beyond all plausibility and say that Hanjour—whose flight instructor claimed “couldn’t fly at all”—somehow managed to figure out their exact position on the American landscape in relation to their intended target. Once he had determined exactly where he was, he would need to figure out where the Pentagon was located in relation to his rapidly-changing position. He would then need to plot a course to his target (one he cannot see with his eyes—remember, our ace is flying solely on instruments). In order to perform this bit of electronic navigation, he would have to be very familiar with Instrument Flight Rules procedures. None of these alleged hijackers even knew what a navigational chart looked like, much less how to how to plug information into flight management computers (FMC) and engage LNAV (lateral navigation automated mode). To get around this little problem, the official storyline suggests these men manually flew their aircraft to their respective targets. But let’s assume Hanjour disengaged the autopilot and auto-throttle and hand-flew the aircraft to its intended target on instruments alone until such time as he could get a visual fix. According to FAA radar controllers, “Flight 77” then suddenly pops up over Washington DC and executes an incredibly precise diving turn at a rate of 360 degrees/minute while descending at 3,500 ft/min, (to hide from FAA radar) at the end of which “Hanjour” allegedly levels out at ground level. Oh, I almost forgot: He also had the presence of mind to turn off the transponder in the middle of this incredibly difficult maneuver. The maneuver was in fact so precisely executed that the air traffic controllers at Dulles refused to believe the blip on their screen was a commercial airliner. Danielle O’Brian, one of the air traffic controllers at Dulles who reported seeing the aircraft at 9:25 said, “The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane.” (https://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=4084) And then, all of a sudden we have magic. Voila! Hanjour finds the Pentagon sitting squarely in his sights right before him. The very same challenges mentioned above would have faced the pilots who flew the two 767s into the Twin Towers, in that they, too, would have had to have first found their targets. Again, these chaps, too, miraculously found themselves spot on course. And again, their “final approach” maneuvers at over 500 MPH are simply far too incredible to have been executed by pilots who could not solo basic training aircraft. “Regarding your comments on flight simulators, several of my colleagues and I have tried to simulate the ‘hijacker’s’ final approach maneuvers into the towers on our company 767 simulator. We tried repeated tight, steeply banked 180 turns at 500 mph followed by a fast rollout and lineup with a tall building. More than two-thirds of those who attempted the maneuver failed to make a ‘hit’. How these rookies who couldn’t fly a trainer pulled this off is beyond comprehension.” Conclusion The writers of the official storyline expect us to believe, that once the flight deck crews had been overpowered, and the hijackers “took control” of the various aircraft, their intended targets suddenly popped up in their windshields as they would have in some arcade game, and all that these fellows would have had to do was simply aim their airplanes at the buildings and fly into them. Most people who have been exposed only to the official storyline have never been on the flight deck of an airliner at altitude and looked at the outside world; if they had, they’d realize the absurdity of this kind of reasoning. https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2010/08/13/nila-sagadevan-911-the-impossibility-of-flying-heavy-aircraft-without-training/

Alan Gough Saturday, April 14, 2018 3:39 am

A brand new Grand Jury Petition court document filed in the supreme court of New York on April 10, 2018 proving that 911 was done with thermite and incendiaries https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/lc-doj-grand-jury-petition/

9/11 Truth Action Project

Saturday, April 14, 2018 3:39 am

April 15 Spring Actions in various cities around the country: https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/731-united-day-of-action-against-u-s-wars-at-home-and-abroad

United Day of Action Against U.S. Wars at Home and Abroad

911tap.org

American working people know they are being asked to forego funding of basic human needs to divert money to unproductive military expenditures. Join the Spring Action 2018 protests – and include a 9/11 Truth message.

Comments

Richard McManus Tuesday, March 27, 2018 9:38 pm

The collapse of the Plasco Building in Iran - The white smoking gun! https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=building+collapse+in+iran&&view=detail&mid=B74A248683BF6D928AF1B74A248683BF6D928AF1&&FORM=VDRVRV You can see the orange flash of flame in three explosions in these videos. There is no fire at the lower floors where these flashes come out. Also a controlled explosion tries to fold the sides of a building onto itself so the collapse occurs as close as possible into the footprint of the building and do less damage to surrounding structures or people. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MgJTa7SDaY In this video you can see the termite burning within the molten steel. When termite burns it produces white smoke called aluminum oxide. It is so hot the steel teeth on the excavator start to turn red hot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJeQghFOe9E&index=10&list=PLUshF3H0xxH3WcOFWzcSg_gmce0wrDolF Here is a fire fighter explaining the explosion that were heard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEN8z7wQ8lQ&index=7&list=PLUshF3H0xxH3WcOFWzcSg_gmce0wrDolF Notice all the water being poured onto the wreckage. Any hydrocarbon fire would not keep burning to such a degree to produce all the white smoke. And the wreckage burnt for three days they are saying. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiXyHp8vIIk&t=32s News story showing white smoke on day four after the collapse https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1GWWwdkJ_A In memory of the Plasco Building 30 fire fighters https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9y8zcY_tEq0

Kate Dickinson Friday, March 30, 2018 2:59 pm

Why couldn't they recover the 4 black boxes (first time in HISTORY) but were somehow able to recover a paper passport of one of the hijackers?

Веселин Божиков Monday, April 02, 2018 2:51 pm

Democratorship - Democratic Matrices /Technology of Post-Truth/

Alan Gough Saturday, April 14, 2018 3:39 am

A brand new Grand Jury Petition court document filed in the supreme court of New York on April 10, 2018 proving that 911 was done with thermite and incendiaries https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/lc-doj-grand-jury-petition/

9/11 Truth Action Project

Monday, April 09, 2018 9:26 pm

Dr. David Ray Griffin and Elizabeth Woodworth, in their statement, remind all of us that the process of understanding the events of 9/11 is a multifaceted and multidisciplinary effort that requires the best evidence to be obtained, evaluated and then used to test hypotheses.

Addressing Controversy Within the 9/11 Truth Community, A Reminder from the 9/11 Consensus Panel

911tap.org

A recent escalation of a simmering controversy within the 9/11 Truth community has prompted a statement from the co-founders of the 9/11 Consensus Panel promoting the use of the standard scientific process.

Comments

Brent Gingell Saturday, March 17, 2018 5:24 pm

Bullshit

Jack Tamali Saturday, March 17, 2018 5:42 pm

First, it appears to be an admission that you cannot acknowledge that a plane hit the Pentagon, despite sufficient evidence. This appears to be a sacrifice in pursuing the truth to appease a larger audience. Second, this has all the hallmarks of an authoritative body set to politicize science by defining 'best evidence' (when it seems you cannot arrive at it with the Pentagon) and, third, it actually includes the word "consensus" in its title. Consensus science is not science at all, but more of a religion, as demonstrated by the IPCC. You don't need it. It's not difficult to determine: 1. 9/11 was a false flag attack with an agenda behind it. 2. Who was involved with the planning, execution and cover-up of 9/11. 3. The agenda behind 9/11.

Charlie J Rod Saturday, March 17, 2018 5:59 pm

Will Sturtridge

David Allen Minnich Saturday, March 17, 2018 6:15 pm

Well documented crime of the century.

Michael Gray Saturday, March 17, 2018 6:48 pm

You will always have opponents to truth within your group. They have been with you since day one and have had years to polish their methods of diminishing your message. One of their tried and true ploys is to make you look foolish by adding absurd elements to your narrative. They hope to keep you in the "lunatic fringe" by association with tin-foil hat stories of mysterious like HAARP references, death rays, Illuminatti, etc. Also, regrettably, you attract genuine flakes who actually believe nonsense science fiction imaginings.

A.c. Johnson Saturday, March 17, 2018 8:38 pm

"If it's consensus, it ain't science." Michael Crichton

Jeff Cox Saturday, March 17, 2018 9:45 pm

there is overwhelming physical evidence that it was a conspiracy to change the worlds thinking by the elite. Sad thing is... there is nothing we can do about it.

Richard McManus Saturday, March 17, 2018 10:19 pm

2,965 architects and engineers, http://www.ae911truth.org some 600 PhD scientists and some 350 skilled commercial airplane pilots believe the World Trade Center buildings collapsed due to explosion, the official story is full of BS, and the corporate media is grossly negligence in not reporting the truth, we want a new public Congressional investigation of 9/11. These people want a new Congressional investigation of 9/11 Former Senator Mike Gravel , Vice President Walter Mondale , Senator Charles Schumer Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Senator Max Cleland, Gov. Walter Peterson-NH Former US Senator Mike Gravel - AK, Gen. Wesley Clark, Louis Freeh Rep. Curt Weldon, Cynthia McKinney, Rep. Kucinich , Gov. Jessey Ventura, Sen. Rand Paul, Sen. Ron Paul, Major General Albert Stubblebine http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/ Here is a summary of the evidence. 16 miracles related to 9/11 1. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 were the only steel-framed high-rise buildings ever to come down without explosives or incendiaries. 2. The Twin Towers, each of which had 287 steel columns, were brought down solely by a combination of airplane strikes and jet-fuel fires. 3. WTC 7 was not hit by a plane, ever before or after 9/11 has a steel high rise building (47 stories) ever collapsed due to fire and many burnt total from ground up to the top for way longer than five hours (think all day!) 4. WTC 7 collapsed in absolute free fall – for over two seconds. 5. The collapses imitated the kinds of implosions that can be induced only by demolition companies. 6. In the case of WTC 7, the structure came down symmetrically (straight down, with an almost perfectly horizontal roofline), which meant that all 82 of the steel support columns had to fall simultaneously, although the building’s fires had a very asymmetrical pattern. 7. The South Tower’s upper 30-floor block changed its angular momentum in midair after tipping some 22 degree. Yet the laws of physics says it should have toppled completely off the side of the Tower and landed on the ground in one big chuck. 8. This 30 floor block then disintegrated from the bottom like a cube of button on a hot frying pan. 9. With regard to the North Tower, some of its steel columns were ejected out horizontally for at least 500 feet. 10. The oxygen starved fires in the pile of debris from the WTC buildings could not be extinguished for many months. Almost 12 weeks after September 11th, there was at least one fire still burning in the rubble – it is the longest-burning structural fire in history. After five days of cooling and despite being sprayed with water, they were still above the melting point of aluminum. A thermal map of Ground Zero created from infrared data collected by a NASA plane that overflew the site on September 16th. The map, created by the U.S. Geological Survey, shows hot spots on the surface of the rubble that were above 1,292 degrees F. FIVE DAYS AFTER THE COLLAPSE! Yet the fire fighters poured water on the surface of the wreckage for five days prior to this survey. Impossible for a normal hydrocarbon fire. Any fire underneath the surface of the wreckages was oxygen starved given all the fine concrete dust within the wreckage and water. And debris stated on fire when exposed by air during the cleaning up of the wreckage. 11. Although the WTC fires, based on ordinary building fires, could not have produced temperatures above 1,800℉, the fires inexplicably melted metals with much higher melting points, such as iron (2,800℉) and even molybdenum (4,753℉). http://journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf Yet the block smoke coming off the Twin Towers is evidence of a relatively cool fire of at most some 1,000 degree F. and with a nine mph cool breeze blowing thru the building. 12. A compound called nano thermite was found in at least four sample of the dust (power) were collected on September 11th 2001 around collapsed Twin Towers. This compound was in the form of red and gray microscopic chips. The chemical signature of many of the WTC dust spheres also "strikingly" matches that of the microscopic iron spheres found after testing a sample of nano-thermite chips. This chemical compound was invented by Lawerence Livermore Labs a year or so prior to 9/11. Microscopic iron spheres are always produced when nano thermite ignited when heated to a start the chemical reaction, just like heat from friction ignites a match. And It burns at some $5,000 F. Air pressures cause the spherical shape, just like air pressure forms rain drops. 13. Some of the steel in the debris had been sulfidized, resulting in Swiss-cheese-appearing steel, even though ordinary building fires could not have resulted in the sulfidation. Thermate is chemical compound when mixed contains sulfur becomes thermite and nano-thermite, contains sulfur.

Richard McManus Saturday, March 17, 2018 10:19 pm

14. These World Trade Center buildings also came down in free fall – the Twin Towers in virtual free fall. But “virtual” is meant too fast if a real collapse with crushing of upper floors onto lower floors had occurred, therefore, a logical explanation at least some explosions happened and not only crushing of steel on steel. 15. As a passenger on AA Flight 77, Barbara Olson called her husband, telling him about hijackers on her plane, even though this plane had no onboard phones and its altitude was too high for a cell phone call to get through. 16. Hijacker pilot Hani Hanjour could not possibly have flown the trajectory of AA 77 to strike Wedge 1 of the Pentagon, and yet he did. Why some 350 skilled commercial airplane pilots want a new investigation So here is a one aeronautical engineer and a pilot argument explains why none of the alleged 19 hijacker could have flown the four 9/11 jets. They had proved to be too incompetent to fly a little Cessna 172 single. There are some who maintain that the mythical 9/11 hijackers, although had acquired the impressive skills that enabled them to fly airliners by training in flight simulators. What follows is an attempt to bury this myth once and for all, because I’ve heard this ludicrous explanation bandied about, ad nauseam, on the Internet and the TV networks—invariably by people who know nothing substantive about flight simulators, flying, or even airplanes. A common misconception non-pilots have about simulators is how “easy” it is to operate them. They are indeed relatively easy to operate if the objective is to make a few lazy turns and frolic about in the “open sky”. But if the intent in using the simulator is to execute any kind of a maneuver with even the least bit of precision, the task immediately becomes quite daunting. And if the aim is to navigate to a specific geographic location hundreds of miles away while flying at over 500 MPH, 30,000 feet above the ground the challenges become virtually impossible for an untrained pilot. For one, even touching the steering wheel (the yoke) of the airplane slightly at some 500 mph will put the airplane way off course. For a person not conversant with the practical complexities of pilotage, a modern flight simulator could present a terribly confusing and disorienting experience. These complex training devices are not even remotely similar to the video games one sees in amusement arcades, or even the software versions available for home computers. In order to operate a modern flight simulator with any level of skill, one has to not only be a decent pilot to begin with, but also a skilled instrument-rated one to boot — and be thoroughly familiar with the actual aircraft type the simulator represents, since the cockpit layouts vary between aircraft. Once you’ve rotated, climbed out, and reached cruising altitude in a simulator (or real airplane), and find yourself en route to some distant destination (using sophisticated electronic navigation techniques), the situation changes drastically: the pilot loses virtually all external visual reference cues, and is left entirely at the mercy of an array of complex flight and navigation instruments to provide situational cues (altitude, heading, speed, attitude, etc.) At some 30,000 feet above the ground is a lot different than flying at some 3,000 feet at 500 mph vs. following a highway flying a Cessna by looking out the airplane window at some 100 mph. In the case of a Boeing 757 or 767, the pilot would be faced with an EFIS (Electronic Flight Instrumentation System) panel comprised of six large multi-mode LCDs interspersed with clusters of assorted “hard” instruments. These displays process the raw aircraft system and flight data into an integrated picture of the aircraft situation, position and progress, not only in horizontal and vertical dimensions, but also with regard to time and speed as well. If one cannot translate this information quickly, precisely and accurately (and it takes an instrument-rated pilot to do so), one would have ZERO SITUATIONAL AWARENESS. I.e., the pilot wouldn’t have a clue where s/he was in relation to the earth. And know where the FAA radar coverage was so poor when he made his 360 degree making a turn-around to head back to New York City, could not be seen after he turned off the transponder. Flight under such conditions is referred to as “IFR”, or Instrument Flight Rules. Let me place this in the context of the 9/11 hijacker-pilots. These men were repeatedly deemed incompetent to solo a simple Cessna-172 — an elementary exercise that involves flying this little trainer once around the patch on a sunny day. A student’s first solo flight involves a simple circuit: take-off, followed by four gentle left turns ending with a landing back on the runway. This is as basic as flying can possibly get. Not one of the hijackers was deemed fit to perform this most elementary exercise by himself. In fact, here’s what their flight instructors had to say about the aptitude of these budding aviators: Mohammed Atta: “His attention span was zero.” https://www.willthomas.net/911/911_Commission_Hearing.htm Khalid Al-Mihdhar: “We didn’t kick him out, but he didn’t live up to our standards.” https://100777.com/node/237 Marwan Al-Shehhi: “He was dropped because of his limited English and incompetence at the controls.” https://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/9-11/9-11_hijackers_still_alive.htm

Richard McManus Saturday, March 17, 2018 10:20 pm

Salem Al-Hazmi: “We advised him to quit after two lessons.” https://www.willthomas.net/Books_Videos/911_Investigations_Stand_Down.htm Hani Hanjour: “His English was horrible, and his mechanical skills were even worse. It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.” https://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hanjour.html Now let’s take a look at American Airlines Flight 77 that allegedly flew into the Pentagon. Passenger/hijacker Hani Hanjour presumably rises from his seat midway through the flight, viciously fights his way into the cockpit with his cohorts, overpowers Captain Charles F. Burlingame and First Officer David Charlebois, and somehow manages to toss them out of the cockpit (for starters, very difficult to achieve in a cramped environment without inadvertently impacting (slightly touching) the yoke and thereby disengaging the autopilot). One would correctly presume that this would present considerable difficulties to a little chap with a box cutter—Burlingame was a tough, burly, ex-Vietnam F4 fighter jock who had flown over 100 combat missions. Every pilot who knows him says that rather than politely hand over the controls, Burlingame would have instantly rolled the plane on its back so that Hanjour would have broken his neck when he hit the floor. But let’s ignore this almost natural reaction expected of a fighter pilot and proceed with this charade. Imagine that Hanjour overpowers the flight deck crew, removes them from the cockpit and takes his position in the captain’s seat. The weather reports say it was fairly clear, so let’s say Hanjour experienced a perfect Ceiling and Visibility Unlimited day. Below him is a murky brownish-grey-green landscape, virtually devoid of any significant surface detail, while the aircraft he was now piloting was moving along, almost imperceptibly and in eerie silence, at around 500 mph. He wouldn’t have had a clue as to where, precisely, he was. There’s nothing there to give him any real visual cues. Mr. Hanjour would be forced to divert his attention to his instrument panel, where he’d be faced with a bewildering array of instruments—nothing like he had seen in a Cessna 172. He would then have to very quickly interpret his heading, ground track, altitude, and airspeed information on the displays before he could even figure out where in the world he was, much less where the Pentagon was located in relation to his position. After all, before he can crash into a target, he has to first find the target. But, for the sake of discussion let’s stretch things beyond all plausibility and say that Hanjour—whose flight instructor claimed “couldn’t fly at all”—somehow managed to figure out their exact position on the American landscape in relation to their intended target. Once he had determined exactly where he was, he would need to figure out where the Pentagon was located in relation to his rapidly-changing position. He would then need to plot a course to his target (one he cannot see with his eyes—remember, our ace is flying solely on instruments). In order to perform this bit of electronic navigation, he would have to be very familiar with Instrument Flight Rules procedures. None of these alleged hijackers even knew what a navigational chart looked like, much less how to how to plug information into flight management computers (FMC) and engage LNAV (lateral navigation automated mode). To get around this little problem, the official storyline suggests these men manually flew their aircraft to their respective targets. But let’s assume Hanjour disengaged the autopilot and auto-throttle and hand-flew the aircraft to its intended target on instruments alone until such time as he could get a visual fix. According to FAA radar controllers, “Flight 77” then suddenly pops up over Washington DC and executes an incredibly precise diving turn at a rate of 360 degrees/minute while descending at 3,500 ft/min, (to hide from FAA radar) at the end of which “Hanjour” allegedly levels out at ground level. Oh, I almost forgot: He also had the presence of mind to turn off the transponder in the middle of this incredibly difficult maneuver. The maneuver was in fact so precisely executed that the air traffic controllers at Dulles refused to believe the blip on their screen was a commercial airliner. Danielle O’Brian, one of the air traffic controllers at Dulles who reported seeing the aircraft at 9:25 said, “The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane.” (https://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=4084) And then, all of a sudden we have magic. Voila! Hanjour finds the Pentagon sitting squarely in his sights right before him. The very same challenges mentioned above would have faced the pilots who flew the two 767s into the Twin Towers, in that they, too, would have had to have first found their targets. Again, these chaps, too, miraculously found themselves spot on course. And again, their “final approach” maneuvers at over 500 MPH are simply far too incredible to have been executed by pilots who could not solo basic training aircraft. “Regarding your comments on flight simulators, several of my colleagues and I have tried to simulate the ‘hijacker’s’ final approach maneuvers into the towers on our company 767 simulator. We tried repeated tight, steeply banked 180 turns at 500 mph followed by a fast rollout and lineup with a tall building. More than two-thirds of those who attempted the maneuver failed to make a ‘hit’. How these rookies who couldn’t fly a trainer pulled this off is beyond comprehension.” Conclusion The writers of the official storyline expect us to believe, that once the flight deck crews had been overpowered, and the hijackers “took control” of the various aircraft, their intended targets suddenly popped up in their windshields as they would have in some arcade game, and all that these fellows would have had to do was simply aim their airplanes at the buildings and fly into them. Most people who have been exposed only to the official storyline have never been on the flight deck of an airliner at altitude and looked at the outside world; if they had, they’d realize the absurdity of this kind of reasoning. https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2010/08/13/nila-sagadevan-911-the-impossibility-of-flying-heavy-aircraft-without-training/

Alan Gough Monday, April 09, 2018 9:26 pm

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lawyers-and-911-victim-family-members-file-doj-petition-demanding-911-grand-jury-investigation-of-new-evidence-300625964.html

9/11 Truth Action Project

Monday, March 19, 2018 12:15 am

The 9/11 Truth Action Project (911 TAP), founded in 2016 from the melding of several organizations that had focused on seeking justice and accountability for the crimes of 9/11, has continued to grow.

9/11 TAP: The 2017 Year in Review

911tap.org

The year 2017 was a year of growth for the 9/11 Truth Action Project and 2018 has begun! We invite your continued participation and support to carry out our mission and impact the political realities of our world.

Comments

Ray Kraaijenhagen Saturday, March 17, 2018 5:57 pm

Think outside the boxes, that divide us.

Dwain Deets Saturday, March 17, 2018 6:49 pm

That’s a cool image. Good work.

Richard McManus Monday, March 19, 2018 12:12 am

2,965 architects and engineers, http://www.ae911truth.org some 600 PhD scientists and some 350 skilled commercial airplane pilots believe the World Trade Center buildings collapsed due to explosion, the official story is full of BS, and the corporate media is grossly negligence in not reporting the truth, we want a new public Congressional investigation of 9/11. These people want a new Congressional investigation of 9/11 Former Senator Mike Gravel , Vice President Walter Mondale , Senator Charles Schumer Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Senator Max Cleland, Gov. Walter Peterson-NH Former US Senator Mike Gravel - AK, Gen. Wesley Clark, Louis Freeh Rep. Curt Weldon, Cynthia McKinney, Rep. Kucinich , Gov. Jessey Ventura, Sen. Rand Paul, Sen. Ron Paul, Major General Albert Stubblebine http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/ Here is a summary of the evidence. 16 miracles related to 9/11 1. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 were the only steel-framed high-rise buildings ever to come down without explosives or incendiaries. 2. The Twin Towers, each of which had 287 steel columns, were brought down solely by a combination of airplane strikes and jet-fuel fires. 3. WTC 7 was not hit by a plane, ever before or after 9/11 has a steel high rise building (47 stories) ever collapsed due to fire and many burnt total from ground up to the top for way longer than five hours (think all day!) 4. WTC 7 collapsed in absolute free fall – for over two seconds. 5. The collapses imitated the kinds of implosions that can be induced only by demolition companies. 6. In the case of WTC 7, the structure came down symmetrically (straight down, with an almost perfectly horizontal roofline), which meant that all 82 of the steel support columns had to fall simultaneously, although the building’s fires had a very asymmetrical pattern. 7. The South Tower’s upper 30-floor block changed its angular momentum in midair after tipping some 22 degree. Yet the laws of physics says it should have toppled completely off the side of the Tower and landed on the ground in one big chuck. 8. This 30 floor block then disintegrated from the bottom like a cube of button on a hot frying pan. 9. With regard to the North Tower, some of its steel columns were ejected out horizontally for at least 500 feet. 10. The oxygen starved fires in the pile of debris from the WTC buildings could not be extinguished for many months. Almost 12 weeks after September 11th, there was at least one fire still burning in the rubble – it is the longest-burning structural fire in history. After five days of cooling and despite being sprayed with water, they were still above the melting point of aluminum. A thermal map of Ground Zero created from infrared data collected by a NASA plane that overflew the site on September 16th. The map, created by the U.S. Geological Survey, shows hot spots on the surface of the rubble that were above 1,292 degrees F. FIVE DAYS AFTER THE COLLAPSE! Yet the fire fighters poured water on the surface of the wreckage for five days prior to this survey. Impossible for a normal hydrocarbon fire. Any fire underneath the surface of the wreckages was oxygen starved given all the fine concrete dust within the wreckage and water. And debris stated on fire when exposed by air during the cleaning up of the wreckage. 11. Although the WTC fires, based on ordinary building fires, could not have produced temperatures above 1,800℉, the fires inexplicably melted metals with much higher melting points, such as iron (2,800℉) and even molybdenum (4,753℉). http://journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf Yet the block smoke coming off the Twin Towers is evidence of a relatively cool fire of at most some 1,000 degree F. and with a nine mph cool breeze blowing thru the building. 12. A compound called nano thermite was found in at least four sample of the dust (power) were collected on September 11th 2001 around collapsed Twin Towers. This compound was in the form of red and gray microscopic chips. The chemical signature of many of the WTC dust spheres also "strikingly" matches that of the microscopic iron spheres found after testing a sample of nano-thermite chips. This chemical compound was invented by Lawerence Livermore Labs a year or so prior to 9/11. Microscopic iron spheres are always produced when nano thermite ignited when heated to a start the chemical reaction, just like heat from friction ignites a match. And It burns at some $5,000 F. Air pressures cause the spherical shape, just like air pressure forms rain drops. 13. Some of the steel in the debris had been sulfidized, resulting in Swiss-cheese-appearing steel, even though ordinary building fires could not have resulted in the sulfidation. Thermate is chemical compound when mixed contains sulfur becomes thermite and nano-thermite, contains sulfur.

Richard McManus Monday, March 19, 2018 12:14 am

14. These World Trade Center buildings also came down in free fall – the Twin Towers in virtual free fall. But “virtual” is meant too fast if a real collapse with crushing of upper floors onto lower floors had occurred, therefore, a logical explanation at least some explosions happened and not only crushing of steel on steel. 15. As a passenger on AA Flight 77, Barbara Olson called her husband, telling him about hijackers on her plane, even though this plane had no onboard phones and its altitude was too high for a cell phone call to get through. 16. Hijacker pilot Hani Hanjour could not possibly have flown the trajectory of AA 77 to strike Wedge 1 of the Pentagon, and yet he did. Why some 350 skilled commercial airplane pilots want a new investigation So here is a one aeronautical engineer and a pilot argument explains why none of the alleged 19 hijacker could have flown the four 9/11 jets. They had proved to be too incompetent to fly a little Cessna 172 single. There are some who maintain that the mythical 9/11 hijackers, although had acquired the impressive skills that enabled them to fly airliners by training in flight simulators. What follows is an attempt to bury this myth once and for all, because I’ve heard this ludicrous explanation bandied about, ad nauseam, on the Internet and the TV networks—invariably by people who know nothing substantive about flight simulators, flying, or even airplanes. A common misconception non-pilots have about simulators is how “easy” it is to operate them. They are indeed relatively easy to operate if the objective is to make a few lazy turns and frolic about in the “open sky”. But if the intent in using the simulator is to execute any kind of a maneuver with even the least bit of precision, the task immediately becomes quite daunting. And if the aim is to navigate to a specific geographic location hundreds of miles away while flying at over 500 MPH, 30,000 feet above the ground the challenges become virtually impossible for an untrained pilot. For one, even touching the steering wheel (the yoke) of the airplane slightly at some 500 mph will put the airplane way off course. For a person not conversant with the practical complexities of pilotage, a modern flight simulator could present a terribly confusing and disorienting experience. These complex training devices are not even remotely similar to the video games one sees in amusement arcades, or even the software versions available for home computers. In order to operate a modern flight simulator with any level of skill, one has to not only be a decent pilot to begin with, but also a skilled instrument-rated one to boot — and be thoroughly familiar with the actual aircraft type the simulator represents, since the cockpit layouts vary between aircraft. Once you’ve rotated, climbed out, and reached cruising altitude in a simulator (or real airplane), and find yourself en route to some distant destination (using sophisticated electronic navigation techniques), the situation changes drastically: the pilot loses virtually all external visual reference cues, and is left entirely at the mercy of an array of complex flight and navigation instruments to provide situational cues (altitude, heading, speed, attitude, etc.) At some 30,000 feet above the ground is a lot different than flying at some 3,000 feet at 500 mph vs. following a highway flying a Cessna by looking out the airplane window at some 100 mph. In the case of a Boeing 757 or 767, the pilot would be faced with an EFIS (Electronic Flight Instrumentation System) panel comprised of six large multi-mode LCDs interspersed with clusters of assorted “hard” instruments. These displays process the raw aircraft system and flight data into an integrated picture of the aircraft situation, position and progress, not only in horizontal and vertical dimensions, but also with regard to time and speed as well. If one cannot translate this information quickly, precisely and accurately (and it takes an instrument-rated pilot to do so), one would have ZERO SITUATIONAL AWARENESS. I.e., the pilot wouldn’t have a clue where s/he was in relation to the earth. And know where the FAA radar coverage was so poor when he made his 360 degree making a turn-around to head back to New York City, could not be seen after he turned off the transponder. Flight under such conditions is referred to as “IFR”, or Instrument Flight Rules. Let me place this in the context of the 9/11 hijacker-pilots. These men were repeatedly deemed incompetent to solo a simple Cessna-172 — an elementary exercise that involves flying this little trainer once around the patch on a sunny day. A student’s first solo flight involves a simple circuit: take-off, followed by four gentle left turns ending with a landing back on the runway. This is as basic as flying can possibly get. Not one of the hijackers was deemed fit to perform this most elementary exercise by himself. In fact, here’s what their flight instructors had to say about the aptitude of these budding aviators: Mohammed Atta: “His attention span was zero.” https://www.willthomas.net/911/911_Commission_Hearing.htm Khalid Al-Mihdhar: “We didn’t kick him out, but he didn’t live up to our standards.” https://100777.com/node/237 Marwan Al-Shehhi: “He was dropped because of his limited English and incompetence at the controls.” https://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/9-11/9-11_hijackers_still_alive.htm

Richard McManus Monday, March 19, 2018 12:15 am

Salem Al-Hazmi: “We advised him to quit after two lessons.” https://www.willthomas.net/Books_Videos/911_Investigations_Stand_Down.htm Hani Hanjour: “His English was horrible, and his mechanical skills were even worse. It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.” https://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hanjour.html Now let’s take a look at American Airlines Flight 77 that allegedly flew into the Pentagon. Passenger/hijacker Hani Hanjour presumably rises from his seat midway through the flight, viciously fights his way into the cockpit with his cohorts, overpowers Captain Charles F. Burlingame and First Officer David Charlebois, and somehow manages to toss them out of the cockpit (for starters, very difficult to achieve in a cramped environment without inadvertently impacting (slightly touching) the yoke and thereby disengaging the autopilot). One would correctly presume that this would present considerable difficulties to a little chap with a box cutter—Burlingame was a tough, burly, ex-Vietnam F4 fighter jock who had flown over 100 combat missions. Every pilot who knows him says that rather than politely hand over the controls, Burlingame would have instantly rolled the plane on its back so that Hanjour would have broken his neck when he hit the floor. But let’s ignore this almost natural reaction expected of a fighter pilot and proceed with this charade. Imagine that Hanjour overpowers the flight deck crew, removes them from the cockpit and takes his position in the captain’s seat. The weather reports say it was fairly clear, so let’s say Hanjour experienced a perfect Ceiling and Visibility Unlimited day. Below him is a murky brownish-grey-green landscape, virtually devoid of any significant surface detail, while the aircraft he was now piloting was moving along, almost imperceptibly and in eerie silence, at around 500 mph. He wouldn’t have had a clue as to where, precisely, he was. There’s nothing there to give him any real visual cues. Mr. Hanjour would be forced to divert his attention to his instrument panel, where he’d be faced with a bewildering array of instruments—nothing like he had seen in a Cessna 172. He would then have to very quickly interpret his heading, ground track, altitude, and airspeed information on the displays before he could even figure out where in the world he was, much less where the Pentagon was located in relation to his position. After all, before he can crash into a target, he has to first find the target. But, for the sake of discussion let’s stretch things beyond all plausibility and say that Hanjour—whose flight instructor claimed “couldn’t fly at all”—somehow managed to figure out their exact position on the American landscape in relation to their intended target. Once he had determined exactly where he was, he would need to figure out where the Pentagon was located in relation to his rapidly-changing position. He would then need to plot a course to his target (one he cannot see with his eyes—remember, our ace is flying solely on instruments). In order to perform this bit of electronic navigation, he would have to be very familiar with Instrument Flight Rules procedures. None of these alleged hijackers even knew what a navigational chart looked like, much less how to how to plug information into flight management computers (FMC) and engage LNAV (lateral navigation automated mode). To get around this little problem, the official storyline suggests these men manually flew their aircraft to their respective targets. But let’s assume Hanjour disengaged the autopilot and auto-throttle and hand-flew the aircraft to its intended target on instruments alone until such time as he could get a visual fix. According to FAA radar controllers, “Flight 77” then suddenly pops up over Washington DC and executes an incredibly precise diving turn at a rate of 360 degrees/minute while descending at 3,500 ft/min, (to hide from FAA radar) at the end of which “Hanjour” allegedly levels out at ground level. Oh, I almost forgot: He also had the presence of mind to turn off the transponder in the middle of this incredibly difficult maneuver. The maneuver was in fact so precisely executed that the air traffic controllers at Dulles refused to believe the blip on their screen was a commercial airliner. Danielle O’Brian, one of the air traffic controllers at Dulles who reported seeing the aircraft at 9:25 said, “The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane.” (https://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=4084) And then, all of a sudden we have magic. Voila! Hanjour finds the Pentagon sitting squarely in his sights right before him. The very same challenges mentioned above would have faced the pilots who flew the two 767s into the Twin Towers, in that they, too, would have had to have first found their targets. Again, these chaps, too, miraculously found themselves spot on course. And again, their “final approach” maneuvers at over 500 MPH are simply far too incredible to have been executed by pilots who could not solo basic training aircraft. “Regarding your comments on flight simulators, several of my colleagues and I have tried to simulate the ‘hijacker’s’ final approach maneuvers into the towers on our company 767 simulator. We tried repeated tight, steeply banked 180 turns at 500 mph followed by a fast rollout and lineup with a tall building. More than two-thirds of those who attempted the maneuver failed to make a ‘hit’. How these rookies who couldn’t fly a trainer pulled this off is beyond comprehension.” Conclusion The writers of the official storyline expect us to believe, that once the flight deck crews had been overpowered, and the hijackers “took control” of the various aircraft, their intended targets suddenly popped up in their windshields as they would have in some arcade game, and all that these fellows would have had to do was simply aim their airplanes at the buildings and fly into them. Most people who have been exposed only to the official storyline have never been on the flight deck of an airliner at altitude and looked at the outside world; if they had, they’d realize the absurdity of this kind of reasoning. https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2010/08/13/nila-sagadevan-911-the-impossibility-of-flying-heavy-aircraft-without-training/

9/11 Truth Action Project

Tuesday, March 13, 2018 2:50 am

The organization pursued activities supporting its strategic plan to create a global grass-roots movement.

9/11 Truth Action Project

911tap.org

The mission of the 9/11 Truth Action Project is to build and mobilize a global grassroots movement that will expose the truths of 9/11, create a groundswell of civic support, and the restoration of our civil liberties…

Comments

Gerald Smith Friday, March 09, 2018 6:43 pm

http://www.humanrightssupport.com/

John Inacio Tuesday, March 13, 2018 2:50 am

9/11 Truth Action Project

Thursday, March 08, 2018 11:35 am

During the 16th 9/11 anniversary remembrance events in September 2017, one of the most important milestones was the unveiling of the Bobby McIlvaine World Trade Center Investigation Act by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Support the Bobby McIlvaine Act. https://AE911Truth.org/Justice

Comments

Dee Zee Wednesday, January 17, 2018 3:07 am

All you idiots who hate Muslims......youve been hypnotized.

Stu Price Wednesday, January 17, 2018 6:51 am

Dee zee I agree the truth is exposed but the media and law makers are accomplices to the crime of the century

June Kaczan Wednesday, January 17, 2018 1:36 pm

Yes I agree, explosives where involved. Technically speaking it is an implosion. How they can deny this when the survivors heard the explosives go of is beyond me.

Nicholas Siccone Tuesday, January 23, 2018 12:57 pm

Dick Cheney needed 39 billion dollars

Aziz Hamid Tuesday, January 23, 2018 4:44 pm

Aziz Hamid Tuesday, January 23, 2018 4:45 pm

Sarah Perry Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:51 am

US main media is controlled. (((Many))) have moved to the alt-media, so be careful of truthfulness of content.

Sarah Perry Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:54 am

My comment on 911 was marked as spam.

Sarah Perry Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:55 am

ALL THE PROOF YOU NEED “[The Israeli Mossad is] ruthless and cunning, with the capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian-Arab act.” -Report issued by the U.S. Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS); September 2001 - https:// ehpg. wordpress. com/ israel- did-911/

Trav Williams Wednesday, January 24, 2018 3:05 am

All the traitors that went along with this plan, took part in this attack, helped the cover up and the continuing of the cover up need executed for treason. Guilty of crimes against humanity as well as domestic terrorism since they carried out premeditated murder against their own country.

Pitsa Orfanakos Monday, January 29, 2018 1:08 am

If all the truth movements and researchers could join forces and have a million followers go into Washington one day ? Perhaps some action would be taken.

John Hughes Thursday, March 08, 2018 11:33 am

every picture tells a story

John Hughes Thursday, March 08, 2018 11:34 am

John Hughes Thursday, March 08, 2018 11:35 am

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????

9/11 Truth Action Project

Monday, February 19, 2018 11:49 pm

As David Vine demonstrates, the overseas bases raise geopolitical tensions and provoke widespread antipathy toward the United States. They undermine American democratic ideals, pushing the United States into partnerships with dictators and perpetuating a system of second-class citizenship in territories such as Guam.

9/11 and the Expansion of US Foreign Military Bases

911tap.org

The 'attacks' of 9/11 defused arguments that the United States should reconsider the scope and magnitude of its network of foreign bases around the world – increasing the pressure to expand and build more bases

Comments

Jarl von Arlyon Monday, February 19, 2018 11:49 pm

PNAC

9/11 Truth Action Project

Friday, February 16, 2018 6:49 pm

Truthers is an exciting new Young Adult novel written by Geoffrey Girard. Although this fast paced thriller is aimed at teens, readers of all ages will find it a real page turner.

New Book Overview: 'Truthers'

911tap.org

Truthers is an exciting new Young Adult novel written by Geoffrey Girard. Although this fast paced thriller is aimed at teens, readers of all ages will find it a real page turner. Excellent book for a holiday gift.

Name
E-mail
City
Country
State or Province
Zip/Postal Code
Phone
Receive	Text HTML
Additional Information
I would like to:	Write Articles for TAP Promote Truth Friendly Media Plan Educational Events Help to Build a Truth Friendly Congress Join or Organize Local Action Groups Help Raise Money for TAP Projects Help Reach Out to Other Groups Help in Other Ways
Other ways you may be able to help:

Actions

Latest Tap Events

Newsletters / Action Alerts

Support 9/11 Truth

Actions

9/11 TAP in the Social Media

Newsletters / Action Alerts