What Does Freefall Mean



The form #17 does not exist or it is not published.
What Does Freefall Mean

What Does Freefall Mean

(There are 2 articles in this section)

David chandler, a high school physics teacher instructs us, that "Newton's third law says that when objects interact, they always exert equal and opposite forces on each other. therefore, while an object is falling, if the falling top of the building exerts any force on objects in its path, those objects must push back with equal force slowing the fall." This implies that in order for the top of World Trade Center Building 7 to fall to the ground at free-fall there could be no structure for it to impact below the top. The only way the structure could be removed below the top would be through a process of controlled explosive demolition with something like RDX or HMX explosives in combination with Nano-thermite. This further implies that whoever conceived of the 9/11 attacks would have had to place the explosives in World Trade Center Building 7 weeks or months in advance of 9/11. World Trade Center Building 7, however, is one of the most secure buildings in lower Manhattan because it housed the Internal Revenue Service Regional Council, the U.S. Secret Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York City Office of Emergency Management.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) maintained in its August 2008 Final Draft Report, and the associated technical briefing, that WTC Building 7 took 40% longer to collapse than if it had been in free-fall. NIST Project Leader Shyam Sunder explained that WTC 7 could not have come down in free-fall, because there was resistance to the fall provided by the steel structure underneath. But a determined high school physics teacher in central California, David Chandler, demonstrated that NIST was using fraudulently manipulated data to try to show a slower rate of collapse. David Chandler - "There is…
Published on Feb 16, 2013 In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at free fall, but the cover-up was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged free fall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. This video displays the brazenness of the NIST WTC7 cover-up. [The WTC7 series has elicited a number of questions from people unclear on the details of how I did the measurements, compared to how NIST did them and how the representatives of NIST…